We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Further Empowerment of the Workers' Councils Initiative
Details
Submitted by[?]: Prince-Republican League - New EAPP
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 4525
Description[?]:
A subsequent attempt at giving Democratic Workers' Councils the power to self-organize and self-actualize in the best tradition of workingmen's democracy. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Privacy protection for those in the public eye.
Old value:: There are no restrictions on the media for pursuing personal stories and photos relating to the lives of public figures.
Current: The media may publish personal stories and photos relating to public figures, but only if deemed in the interest of the public.
Proposed: Local governments may determine levels of protection for public figures.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning adoption.
Old value:: Adoption is strictly regulated by the government. Only by passing several tests and by following an intensive program applicants can adopt children.
Current: Adoption is regulated by the government. Applicants can adopt after a routine check-up.
Proposed: Adoption policy is to be established by local governments.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on public nudity.
Old value:: Public nudity is illegal, but private nudist colonies and beaches are permitted.
Current: Public nudity is illegal, but private nudist colonies and beaches are permitted.
Proposed: Public nudity laws are left to local governments.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Government policy toward marriage.
Old value:: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Current: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Proposed: Civil marriages are defined by local governments.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change Policy concerning racial segregation in educational institutions.
Old value:: Segregation is illegal in all educational institutions.
Current: Segregation is illegal in all educational institutions.
Proposed: Segregation policy is set by local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 10:54:09, February 02, 2019 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Progress | To | Debating the Further Empowerment of the Workers' Councils Initiative |
Message | Me and my comrades are having a deja-vu over this. Its now the second attempt to put self-evident human rights into Question by leaving the decision to implement them to local governements. Its a try to outdo Individual freedoms by Devolution. My comrads and me hope other fellow parties see through this foil. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 108 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 139 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 53 |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "Man is by nature a political animal." - Aristotle |