We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Alternative Proposal to Empower the Worker's Councils
Details
Submitted by[?]: Prince-Republican League - New EAPP
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 4527
Description[?]:
| Since the reactionary forces in our midst have thwarted our numerous attempts to give the Democratic Worker's Councils the necessary powers to self-organize and thus paused the vital revolutionary process, we in the EAPP would like to offer an alternative way forward. It is our proposal to go about abolishing the state and reaching socialism in a different way, namely, by giving the local revolutionary vanguard the necessary personal and political power to lead their comrades in this daily revolutionary struggle, aswell as ensure the necessary organic environment for such socialist activity. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Privileges of nobility (if nobility is recognised by the government).
Old value:: Nobility confers only titles and certain minor rights, but no political powers, and can be hereditary.
Current: Nobility confers titles and minor political rights, but no direct control over people or land, and can be hereditary.
Proposed: Nobility confers major rights, and can be hereditary.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Titles of nobility.
Old value:: Titles of nobility are not granted, but their use is not forbidden.
Current: No titles of nobility are granted or recognised, their use is forbidden.
Proposed: Titles of nobility may be granted only by the nation's religious leaders.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning forest protection.
Old value:: Forests are protected. Logging is allowed by licence only.
Current: Forests have strictly enforced protection. Felling is limited to fire breaks.
Proposed: Forests have strictly enforced protection. Felling is limited to fire breaks.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: There is a national agency which exists side-by-side with commercial forestry companies.
Current: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Proposed: Local governments are required to operate forestry agencies, which own and manage all forest land.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 12:03:30, February 05, 2019 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Progress | To | Debating the Alternative Proposal to Empower the Worker's Councils |
| Message | My comrades will never stand for this regressive return to aristocracy, we found to be self-evidently abolished. Although we approve of the stricter forest protection, Part 2 makes this bill unacceptable for every reasonable Democrat in Lodamun. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 172 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 73 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 55 |
| Random fact: In order for a Cabinet bill to pass, more than half of the legislature must vote for it and all of the parties included in the proposed Cabinet must support it. If your nation has a Head of State who is also the Head of Government, then the party controlling this character must also vote for the bill, since the Head of Government is also a member of the Cabinet. If any of these requirements are not met, the bill will not pass. |
| Random quote: "Sometimes it is said that man cannot be trusted with the government of himself. Can he, then, be trusted with the government of others?" - Thomas Jefferson |