We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Improving Military RESOLUTION MUST READ
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Liberal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 4530
Description[?]:
| As my party will say it, we need to improve the military. As such who agrees with this resolution will try cooperating with me: -I will propose a larger budget for military -propose bills that improve military -build and modernize current military(RP bills about Military) -cooperate for a better and improved military Who agrees? |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:35:27, February 11, 2019 CET | From | Hosian Democratic party of Rutania | To | Debating the Improving Military RESOLUTION MUST READ |
| Message | We can see here, even through RLP is a party that aims for a minimized government, but somehow proposes a bill that increases the army size. Is it part of their political agenda to have political self-conflict or is the goal here to purely conteract their opposition? |
| Date | 16:41:25, February 11, 2019 CET | From | National Liberal Party | To | Debating the Improving Military RESOLUTION MUST READ |
| Message | It is purely for improving the army. Getting the government better at defending people. We want strong state to be able to protect people. If you read some about libertarianism is that they believe the state should be small but still able to defend people. How is possible defending without big army? Tell me mister HDpR? With white flags certainly wont work. |
| Date | 17:19:06, February 11, 2019 CET | From | National Liberal Party | To | Debating the Improving Military RESOLUTION MUST READ |
| Message | No answer. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 559 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 72 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 119 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." - Mark Twain |