Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5474
Next month in: 01:51:19
Server time: 10:08:40, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): LC73DunMHP | Moderation | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Desegregation Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Lodamese Democratic Progressive Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 4531

Description[?]:

Segregation is an abomination and we should not be endorsing or enforcing it in any way, shape, or form. The New Green Party of Lodamun is moving to introduce legislation to ban this abhorrent practice.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:35:59, February 12, 2019 CET
FromNational Archreactionary Party
ToDebating the Desegregation Act
MessageMr. Speaker

We are on a dangerous path to serfdom, the newly proposed bill is just as awful as the current law on the issue of issue of segregation, they are both tyrannical on the basis of violation of individual rights. Yes, segregation in public amenities is wrong, all our taxpayers deserve public goods equally, but two wrongs don’t make a right, in a genuine free society, private institutions are free to choose who their customers are. My party will not support this reform unless the bill allows segregation in private institutions.

Thanks
Biggus Diccus

Date21:23:32, February 12, 2019 CET
FromDemocratic Socialist Progress
ToDebating the Desegregation Act
MessageMy Comrades are all for this Change, but havent dared to bring it Forward so far because of reactionary encirclement.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 171

no
  

Total Seats: 110

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

Random quote: "This administration is not sympathetic to corporations; it is indentured to corporations." - Ralph Nader

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 48