We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Desegregation Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Lodamese Democratic Progressive Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 4531
Description[?]:
Segregation is an abomination and we should not be endorsing or enforcing it in any way, shape, or form. The New Green Party of Lodamun is moving to introduce legislation to ban this abhorrent practice. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Racial segregation of public amenities (eg. drinking fountains, public toilets)
Old value:: All government owned public amenities are segregated, private organisations are free to choose.
Current: Segregation of any public amenity is banned.
Proposed: Segregation of any public amenity is banned.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 19:35:59, February 12, 2019 CET | From | National Archreactionary Party | To | Debating the Desegregation Act |
Message | Mr. Speaker We are on a dangerous path to serfdom, the newly proposed bill is just as awful as the current law on the issue of issue of segregation, they are both tyrannical on the basis of violation of individual rights. Yes, segregation in public amenities is wrong, all our taxpayers deserve public goods equally, but two wrongs don’t make a right, in a genuine free society, private institutions are free to choose who their customers are. My party will not support this reform unless the bill allows segregation in private institutions. Thanks Biggus Diccus |
Date | 21:23:32, February 12, 2019 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Progress | To | Debating the Desegregation Act |
Message | My Comrades are all for this Change, but havent dared to bring it Forward so far because of reactionary encirclement. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 171 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 110 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "This administration is not sympathetic to corporations; it is indentured to corporations." - Ralph Nader |