We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Justice plan
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Centralist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 4544
Description[?]:
| The DCP proposals for justice plan with an extra Government funding of 1,000,000,000 SOL |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's position towards the administration of law.
Old value:: There are regional courts, but decisions of regional courts may be appealed to national courts (if the right to appeal exists).
Current: There are regional courts, but decisions of regional courts may be appealed to national courts (if the right to appeal exists).
Proposed: There are no courts, the Head of State will determine what's right or wrong.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:03:21, March 11, 2019 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Justice plan |
| Message | This is ridiculous authoritarianism. |
| Date | 19:09:12, March 11, 2019 CET | From | Democratic Centralist Party | To | Debating the Justice plan |
| Message | Coming from the SDP. That’s all we need to say. DCP |
| Date | 20:09:32, March 11, 2019 CET | From | Faschistische Union | To | Debating the Justice plan |
| Message | We would support article 1 if article 2 is being dropped. |
| Date | 07:48:06, March 12, 2019 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Justice plan |
| Message | How have we promoted authoritarianism in the slightest? You are trying to eliminate the justice department and all checks and balances on the executive branch. |
| Date | 16:50:33, March 13, 2019 CET | From | Hosian Democratic Alliance | To | Debating the Justice plan |
| Message | This law shall abolish the 'Constitutional amendment: Highest Court of Justice Act' presumably |
| Date | 19:18:42, March 13, 2019 CET | From | Hosian Democratic Alliance | To | Debating the Justice plan |
| Message | Well, you withdrew your support pretty quickly. Something we said? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 18 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 57 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "Entrepreneurs are simply those who understand that there is little difference between obstacle and opportunity and are able to turn both to their advantage." - Niccolo Machiavelli |