Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5474
Next month in: 02:26:46
Server time: 05:33:13, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Probax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Logical Proposals Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Dankuk Secularist Party 세상당

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 4549

Description[?]:

Any direct reference to religion in a federal bill within the country shall be prohibited.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:52:31, March 22, 2019 CET
FromSunrise Party 해돋이당
ToDebating the Logical Proposals Bill
MessageThis bill contradicts the Constitution. Article 2 section 4 which states as follows.

"4. All persons shall, within limits not prejudicial to peace and harmony, and not antagonistic to their duties to the country, enjoy freedom of religious belief."

http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=590769

Date22:03:27, March 22, 2019 CET
FromSunrise Party 해돋이당
ToDebating the Logical Proposals Bill
MessageNow if the bill were rewritten to state "any acts of Secretariat that decree anything regarding religion shall not be permitted, provided such act does not contradict Constitutional Article 2 section 4, and cannot be misconstrued as an excuse to outlaw religious practice by individual persons." We'd be more inclined to support it.

Many people in our country like to keep our religion private and undocumented, though we are fiercely defensive of it given that attacks on religion have tended to take a Western Supremacist narrative in the past(i.e. "nonwestern is backwards becuase look at their savage beliefs" sort of argument).

Signed,

Honourable Secretary Park Min Il

Date00:50:28, March 23, 2019 CET
FromDankuk Secularist Party 세상당
ToDebating the Logical Proposals Bill
Message"This bill contradicts the Constitution. Article 2 section 4 which states as follows.

'4. All persons shall, within limits not prejudicial to peace and harmony, and not antagonistic to their duties to the country, enjoy freedom of religious belief.'"

The constitution is still in debate period. This must be passed before it can be cited.

That being said, this bill was not intended to conflict with the religious freedoms of citizens. References to religious practice within federal bills does not affect one's ability to practice their religion.

If there truly exists an issue with how this is worded, we will gladly reword this bill as described by the honorable secretary.

Date00:55:06, March 23, 2019 CET
FromSunrise Party 해돋이당
ToDebating the Logical Proposals Bill
MessageThe constitution was passed as shown here. It is in debate so it is easy to access from the nation's main page.

Here is the bill in which it was voted on
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=593331

Date00:59:22, March 23, 2019 CET
FromDankuk Secularist Party 세상당
ToDebating the Logical Proposals Bill
MessageIt is still believed that the bill does not contradict said section. Nevertheless, the DSP will re-word it in order to prevent future confusion.

Date01:02:43, March 23, 2019 CET
FromDankuk Secularist Party 세상당
ToDebating the Logical Proposals Bill
MessageIt is still believed that the bill does not contradict said section. Nevertheless, the DSP will re-word it in order to prevent future confusion.

Date01:03:16, March 23, 2019 CET
FromSunrise Party 해돋이당
ToDebating the Logical Proposals Bill
MessageWe appreciate that. You are correct that it doesn't by the letter of the law contradict it, though it could be misinterpreted by some as an excuse to penalize religion(especially those of indigenous religions) and so it needs to be more clear.

Date01:11:22, March 23, 2019 CET
FromSunrise Party 해돋이당
ToDebating the Logical Proposals Bill
MessageThere is also the preamble though which elaborates on 3 types of Legitimacy(each legitimacy is intended to serve as a check and balance on the other kind and guard against Totalitarianisms). Totalitarian Ideologies tend to drum up one type of legitimacy while ignoring the others.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
 

Total Seats: 272

abstain
  

Total Seats: 78


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to make a reasonable effort to be accurate when communicating the rules to other players. Any player who manipulatively misleads another player about the rules will be subject to sanction.

Random quote: "It depends upon what the meaning of the word 'is' is." - Bill Clinton

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 49