We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Logical Proposals Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Dankuk Secularist Party 세상당
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 4549
Description[?]:
Any direct reference to religion in a federal bill within the country shall be prohibited. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:52:31, March 22, 2019 CET | From | Sunrise Party 해돋이당 | To | Debating the Logical Proposals Bill |
Message | This bill contradicts the Constitution. Article 2 section 4 which states as follows. "4. All persons shall, within limits not prejudicial to peace and harmony, and not antagonistic to their duties to the country, enjoy freedom of religious belief." http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=590769 |
Date | 22:03:27, March 22, 2019 CET | From | Sunrise Party 해돋이당 | To | Debating the Logical Proposals Bill |
Message | Now if the bill were rewritten to state "any acts of Secretariat that decree anything regarding religion shall not be permitted, provided such act does not contradict Constitutional Article 2 section 4, and cannot be misconstrued as an excuse to outlaw religious practice by individual persons." We'd be more inclined to support it. Many people in our country like to keep our religion private and undocumented, though we are fiercely defensive of it given that attacks on religion have tended to take a Western Supremacist narrative in the past(i.e. "nonwestern is backwards becuase look at their savage beliefs" sort of argument). Signed, Honourable Secretary Park Min Il |
Date | 00:50:28, March 23, 2019 CET | From | Dankuk Secularist Party 세상당 | To | Debating the Logical Proposals Bill |
Message | "This bill contradicts the Constitution. Article 2 section 4 which states as follows. '4. All persons shall, within limits not prejudicial to peace and harmony, and not antagonistic to their duties to the country, enjoy freedom of religious belief.'" The constitution is still in debate period. This must be passed before it can be cited. That being said, this bill was not intended to conflict with the religious freedoms of citizens. References to religious practice within federal bills does not affect one's ability to practice their religion. If there truly exists an issue with how this is worded, we will gladly reword this bill as described by the honorable secretary. |
Date | 00:55:06, March 23, 2019 CET | From | Sunrise Party 해돋이당 | To | Debating the Logical Proposals Bill |
Message | The constitution was passed as shown here. It is in debate so it is easy to access from the nation's main page. Here is the bill in which it was voted on http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=593331 |
Date | 00:59:22, March 23, 2019 CET | From | Dankuk Secularist Party 세상당 | To | Debating the Logical Proposals Bill |
Message | It is still believed that the bill does not contradict said section. Nevertheless, the DSP will re-word it in order to prevent future confusion. |
Date | 01:02:43, March 23, 2019 CET | From | Dankuk Secularist Party 세상당 | To | Debating the Logical Proposals Bill |
Message | It is still believed that the bill does not contradict said section. Nevertheless, the DSP will re-word it in order to prevent future confusion. |
Date | 01:03:16, March 23, 2019 CET | From | Sunrise Party 해돋이당 | To | Debating the Logical Proposals Bill |
Message | We appreciate that. You are correct that it doesn't by the letter of the law contradict it, though it could be misinterpreted by some as an excuse to penalize religion(especially those of indigenous religions) and so it needs to be more clear. |
Date | 01:11:22, March 23, 2019 CET | From | Sunrise Party 해돋이당 | To | Debating the Logical Proposals Bill |
Message | There is also the preamble though which elaborates on 3 types of Legitimacy(each legitimacy is intended to serve as a check and balance on the other kind and guard against Totalitarianisms). Totalitarian Ideologies tend to drum up one type of legitimacy while ignoring the others. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||
no |
Total Seats: 272 | ||
abstain |
Total Seats: 78 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to make a reasonable effort to be accurate when communicating the rules to other players. Any player who manipulatively misleads another player about the rules will be subject to sanction. |
Random quote: "It depends upon what the meaning of the word 'is' is." - Bill Clinton |