We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: National Service Act 4553
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 4554
Description[?]:
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change National service.
Old value:: All adults upon completion of schooling must serve either a term in the military or a lesser paid term of civilian national service, at their option.
Current: All adults upon completion of schooling must serve either a term in the military or a lesser paid term of civilian national service, at their option.
Proposed: All adults upon completion of schooling can be required in times of war to serve a term in the military.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 14:52:45, April 01, 2019 CET | From | Neoliberal Party | To | Debating the National Service Act 4553 |
Message | Mr Speaker. Of course when prompted the SDP proposes another Nat. Service bill. I am unsure whether this is better or not than our current policy because although it is instead only required at times of war it requires military service and does not give an option. If conscientious objectors are given full privileges I would be okay with this bill, but if not this may actually be worse in some ways. Theresa April, Leader of the Neoliberal Party |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 393 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 145 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
Random quote: Although I understand and respect the intentions behind the gesture, this is not something that is universally understood or appreciated, and it tends to give out a negative impression of our party. ~ Anton Weinreich, General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party, pleading with his members to stop burning the national flag |