Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5474
Next month in: 02:21:18
Server time: 17:38:41, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): GLNBei | lulus | Mity1 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Government's 2 year plan for Economic Growth

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Renew

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes to change income taxes. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 4560

Description[?]:

This proposal is two pronged and will provide a skyrocket to the economy. If passed the massive budget surplus will ensure that no debt is incurred for two years. To be clear, this is a two year plan at the end of two years in the year 4562 a referendum will be had to incorporate a 6% National General Sales Tax. If the referendum fails then the 18% Income Tax will be reinstated.

This vote is to instate a 0% Income Tax and placing the 6% Sales Tax on the next General Election which is currently set for April 4562

Archibald Salvo II
Minister of Finance

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:16:22, April 13, 2019 CET
FromLibertarian Socialist Party (LSP/PSL)
ToDebating the Government's 2 year plan for Economic Growth
MessageSo, taking from the poor and giving to the rich?Like that will help the economy.The rich won’t use their money, maybe spend it on more useless things.The poor and middle classes will actually use their money therefore running the economy.


Josè Dias September 4559
Leader of the Opposition

Date01:05:31, April 13, 2019 CET
FromGaduridos Freedom Party
ToDebating the Government's 2 year plan for Economic Growth
MessageWhat on earth are you doing?

Domenico Rodriguez
Gaduridos Freedom Party Leader

Date01:05:48, April 13, 2019 CET
FromGaduridos Freedom Party
ToDebating the Government's 2 year plan for Economic Growth
MessageOOC: To SCP

Date01:10:54, April 13, 2019 CET
FromLibertarian Socialist Party (LSP/PSL)
ToDebating the Government's 2 year plan for Economic Growth
MessageOOC:I know

Date02:04:33, April 13, 2019 CET
FromConservative Renew
ToDebating the Government's 2 year plan for Economic Growth
MessageMr Rodriguez is asking what we are doing the answer is simple. We are transforming our tax system from income tax to the General Sales Tax. We are using our massive budget surplus to Benifit all citizens. And then we are giving the people a choice wether they want to persue a new direction or not. I'll tell you what we aren't doing! We aren't raising taxes and causing our economy to crash into a recession which we still have yet to recover from! And we are not proposing a 90% top tax rate!

Martin Wu-Xeping
Prime Minister of Gaduridos

Date02:41:10, April 13, 2019 CET
FromGaduridos Freedom Party
ToDebating the Government's 2 year plan for Economic Growth
MessageSo, you're turning Gaduridos into a income tax haven?

Date02:42:07, April 13, 2019 CET
FromGaduridos Freedom Party
ToDebating the Government's 2 year plan for Economic Growth
MessageAlso, now that the CCE is gone, we should scrap the 90% tax bill.

Date03:00:11, April 13, 2019 CET
FromLibertarian Socialist Party (LSP/PSL)
ToDebating the Government's 2 year plan for Economic Growth
MessageWait what?Massive surplus?If that’s a massive surplus then 2+2=5.Why do you think the people would vote for giving rich people more money in exchange for losing money?You have no sympathy to the poor or the middle class.


Josè Dias September 4559
Leader of the opposition

Date23:33:22, April 13, 2019 CET
FromConservative Renew
ToDebating the Government's 2 year plan for Economic Growth
MessageOur surplus currently sits at 3,742,599,887,929 and is currently projected to surpass 4 Trillion next year. That is a massive surplus! And now under our new system everyone would pay based on consumption, the rich would likely consume more so they would pay more tax. This is a option to fix our broken and stalled economy.

Martin Wu-Xeping
Prime Minister of Gaduridos

Date01:45:10, April 14, 2019 CET
FromLibertarian Socialist Party (LSP/PSL)
ToDebating the Government's 2 year plan for Economic Growth
MessageNo, it is 648,636,078,373.The rich does not consume more, unless you're talking about luxury items, they don't need to.The poor and middle classes do.A broken and stalled economy created by your government.

Josè Dias March 4560
Leader of the Opposition

Date02:03:19, April 14, 2019 CET
FromConservative Renew
ToDebating the Government's 2 year plan for Economic Growth
MessageOOC: Not sure if you have been following the GDP and Debt Tracker
http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=596398

But I have been compounding the deficits or surplus since the Trackers inception. So that is why I referenced the Surplus at 3,742,599,887,929 instead of the yearly surplus of 648,636,078,373

Date04:53:21, April 14, 2019 CET
FromGaduridos Freedom Party
ToDebating the Government's 2 year plan for Economic Growth
MessageOOC: I have no idea what is happening so I'll pretend to be a total idiot IC.

Date06:41:00, April 14, 2019 CET
FromLibertarian Socialist Party (LSP/PSL)
ToDebating the Government's 2 year plan for Economic Growth
MessageOOC:NP pls abstain

Date06:57:36, April 14, 2019 CET
FromLibertarian Socialist Party (LSP/PSL)
ToDebating the Government's 2 year plan for Economic Growth
MessageOOC:I take that back

Date01:27:44, April 15, 2019 CET
FromLibertarian Socialist Party (LSP/PSL)
ToDebating the Government's 2 year plan for Economic Growth
MessageOOC:For legal reasons that’s a joke

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 106

no
 

Total Seats: 115

abstain
   

Total Seats: 29


Random fact: The influence a bill has on elections decreases over time, until it eventually is no longer relevant. This can explain shifts in your party's position to the electorate and your visibility.

Random quote: "I'm not an environmentalist. I'm an earth warrior." - Darryl Cherney

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 74