We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Debating Chamber!
Details
Submitted by[?]: Right Wing Liberals Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2074
Description[?]:
| For too long now The Council of Likatonia have been forced to debate items in various Beer Halls and behined the Bike Shed. It is now time for us to construct a Chamber for us to resolve those issues that affect us all! RWLP thinks this is appropriate. www.cathedralcity.gov/Main/Images/City%20Hall.jpg |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:46:52, June 09, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Party for Equality | To | Debating the Debating Chamber! |
| Message | behind bike sheds? well that will serve you right for abolishing national parks... but yes, a hall is a great idea, as long as we have the cash. |
| Date | 23:39:28, June 09, 2005 CET | From | Proletariat Revolution Party | To | Debating the Debating Chamber! |
| Message | We would if PP wasn't stingy. Or...is there something of a old courthouse we could convert into a parliament? |
| Date | 05:45:13, June 10, 2005 CET | From | People's Party | To | Debating the Debating Chamber! |
| Message | Stingy is good ...it prevents govts from doing things they aren't meant to do ...besides PE could you lay off the insults? Its getting a little annoying to reply politely to all your rude remarks. |
| Date | 07:06:41, June 10, 2005 CET | From | Right Wing Liberals Party | To | Debating the Debating Chamber! |
| Message | (OOC) LPE Of course the bike sheds i want the national parks back! HA HA PP : P (IC)Its Erelavent how much it would cost we must acommadate our Leaders and Politicians. But of course they only need somewhere adequte to debate not a Luxury Palace. |
| Date | 08:26:23, June 10, 2005 CET | From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the Debating Chamber! |
| Message | RWLP, PEL, and LPE - you should all be ashamed of yourselves, you're all being insulting. We just need to convert an old courthouse. It won't be expensive. |
| Date | 13:51:59, June 10, 2005 CET | From | Right Wing Liberals Party | To | Debating the Debating Chamber! |
| Message | *LFP feels left out* LFP do you truely expect 300 Members to seat in a Common Courthouse?!! |
| Date | 18:46:49, June 11, 2005 CET | From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the Debating Chamber! |
| Message | No, which is just another reason not to turn our parliament into 300 members. My compatriots, this is an example of the kind of expense a large parliament causes. If we go to 300 representatives, then we'll need to construct a new and expensive building. If we go to 400 representatives, we'll need to construct an even larger one. Heaven forbid, if we went all the way to 750 we'd be constructed a complex that would likely dominate the entire center of our capital. |
| Date | 09:18:02, June 12, 2005 CET | From | Proletariat Revolution Party | To | Debating the Debating Chamber! |
| Message | PP - I was calling you stingy in regards to the fact that you always seem to critisize anything left-wing I put forward by saying it'll cost us to implement, even when it doesn't. I was just getting so tired of hearing the same thing over and over... |
| Date | 05:41:49, June 16, 2005 CET | From | People's Party | To | Debating the Debating Chamber! |
| Message | But it does!!!:) Anyway, the idea is that on a lot of legislation like healthcare and education, you have a wide range of conservative support.... This tends to be pretty unshakeable ..verging on the point of fantasy, so arguing it on its merits is a waste of my time. The only thing I can raise therfore is the spending bogey...and that's why it keeps coming up. Anyway, i'll try to broaden my attack a bit....for your sanity and mine. I do have a few issues too...and I hope you respond in kind...i suggest you check your mail and reply to the message i had sent you ...although irrelevant in the current context, it would be nice to get a reply. |
| Date | 13:43:49, June 17, 2005 CET | From | Right Wing Liberals Party | To | Debating the Debating Chamber! |
| Message | Should we find a nice pic or just assume? |
| Date | 09:51:48, June 18, 2005 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the Debating Chamber! |
| Message | It is worthy of our nation to provide its' elected representatives a proper structure in which to debate and vote on the matters that concern our great nation. This building should also include offices in which the legislative members can meet, discuss various proposals, and perhaps even include office space for them as well. I fully agree with the spirit of this resolution in its' present incarnation and would gladly vote for it, should it be placed to a vote. I would like to suggest the following photograph on which would could model our own hall: http://www.state.de.us/dedo/new_web_site/Tourism%20and%20Film/Large%20Images/LEGISLATIVE%20HALL.JPG |
| Date | 11:21:35, June 27, 2005 CET | From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the Debating Chamber! |
| Message | The LFP has a contending suggestion for a possible design, and offers this photograph instead: http://www.cathedralcity.gov/Main/Images/City%20Hall.jpg |
| Date | 07:39:37, June 29, 2005 CET | From | Right Wing Liberals Party | To | Debating the Debating Chamber! |
| Message | LFP i like it. |
| Date | 11:31:24, June 29, 2005 CET | From | Edelweiss Party | To | Debating the Debating Chamber! |
| Message | looks very nice! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 200 | ||||||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The majority of nations in Particracy are "Culturally Protected" with an established cultural background. Only the "Culturally Open" nations are not bound by the rules surrounding culture. The Cultural Protocols Index should be consulted for more information about the cultural situation of each nation. |
| Random quote: "Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people." - Karl Marx |