We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Military Rearmament Act I
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Commons Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 4588
Description[?]:
| . |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the export of weapons to other nations.
Old value:: The government must approve all arms sales on a case by case basis.
Current: The government must approve all arms sales on a case by case basis.
Proposed: The government allows conventional arms to be exported freely.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the usage of drones and UAV's
Old value:: The government approves of the usage of unarmed drones and UAVs for reconnaissance.
Current: The government approves of the usage of armed drones and UAVs for reconnaissance and military operations.
Proposed: The government approves of the usage of armed drones and UAVs for reconnaissance and military operations.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change National military policy.
Old value:: The government retains a part time, professional army, navy and air force in alignment with paramilitary groups
Current: The nation retains a full time, professional army, navy and air force.
Proposed: The nation retains a full time, professional army, navy and air force.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change National service.
Old value:: All adults upon completion of schooling can be required in times of war to serve a term in the military.
Current: All adults upon completion of schooling can be required in times of war to serve a term in the military.
Proposed: All adults upon completion of schooling must serve a term in the military.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:05:36, June 08, 2019 CET | From | Lodamese Democratic Progressive Party | To | Debating the Military Rearmament Act I |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, The LGC cannot accept this proposal as we believe current policy is fine. Justin Harris, LGC Chairman |
| Date | 16:06:16, June 08, 2019 CET | From | Lodamese Democratic Progressive Party | To | Debating the Military Rearmament Act I |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, I would like to clarify that the article on National Military Policy. The current policy is supports the current structure of our military(http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=599448) in respect to working in alignment with paramilitary groups. We don't think a change of this policy would be wise without a rehaul of the military structure to support such, something that we don't believe is necessary at this time. Wieze Bout, Lodamun Defense Minister |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 599 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow official national flags of real-life nations or flags which are very prominent and recognisable (eg. the flags of the European Union, the United Nations, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union or the Confederate States of America). |
| Random quote: "What are you trying to protect heterosexual marriages from? There isn't a limited amount of love in Iowa. It isn't a non-renewable resource. If Amy and Barbara or Mike and Steve love each other, it doesn't mean that John and Mary can't." - Ed Fallon |