We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Nations United Against Fascism Treaty
Details
Submitted by[?]: Partito Popolare Osiano
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 4592
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the Nations United Against Fascism Treaty. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Nations United Against Fascism Treaty.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:53:09, June 12, 2019 CET | From | Alleanza Nazionale | To | Debating the Ratification of the Nations United Against Fascism Treaty |
| Message | Mr Speaker, despite tendentially we could be in favor to this treaty, we have some concerns: - should we consider a fascist state any nation which government and/or parliament is controlled by a fascist political movement also if the democratic principles are respected? - The nations which are not in compliance with the articles of the treaty should be considered as fascist? Before to vote in any way we would like to have clarifications on these issues. Thank you - Caterina Morelli |
| Date | 16:21:19, June 14, 2019 CET | From | Partito Popolare Osiano | To | Debating the Ratification of the Nations United Against Fascism Treaty |
| Message | The government will collect the necessary info about theissue you asked. Ministerod Foreign affairs |
| Date | 10:07:47, June 17, 2019 CET | From | Partito Popolare Osiano | To | Debating the Ratification of the Nations United Against Fascism Treaty |
| Message | The party which created the treaty responded in this way: A From the treaty itself, "(2) "Fascist state": Any state committed to fascist policies or ruled by a leader or political party holding fascist beliefs" B: Not all nations that are not in compliance should be considered fascist, but the treaty's articles are a good litmus test. |
| Date | 14:51:36, June 17, 2019 CET | From | Alleanza Nazionale | To | Debating the Ratification of the Nations United Against Fascism Treaty |
| Message | Mr Speaker, We vote against because unless the rights of the citizens and the democratic principle are undermined, we cannot cut relations with nations that just for this or that term are governed by far-right parties. It is excessive such a definition. Thank you - Gianni Almirante, ANI Leader |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |
| yes |
Total Seats: 528 | |
| no |
Total Seats: 153 | |
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left. |
| Random quote: "Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall." - Confucius |