We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Border Control
Details
Submitted by[?]: Socialist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 4597
Description[?]:
| In order to increase tourism revenues, we need to reassure our foreign friends. These invasive security checks are costing a lot of money, freaking out everyone, not doing anything more than satisfying the fantasies of the far-right. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:58:06, June 26, 2019 CET | From | Socialist Party | To | Debating the Border Control |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We did not do the correct procedure for this bill. That does not matter, we'll do another one later. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 362 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 238 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: “Their cheap talk of the 'greater good' is a thinly concealed excuse for subordinating the people to the institutionalized violence that is the state.” - Margaret Woodhall, former Dranian politician |