Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5461
Next month in: 03:12:21
Server time: 16:47:38, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ban Same Sex Marriages

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Party of Telamon

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2066

Description[?]:

As mentioned a thousand times before, marriage is a bond between a man and a women, and this should be all

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:38:58, June 10, 2005 CET
FromTelemon Lutheran Party
ToDebating the Ban Same Sex Marriages
MessageI concur!!!!! It has to be stamped out!!!!! It isnt right, and i advise you all to vote yes!

Date18:27:34, June 12, 2005 CET
FromPeople Party
ToDebating the Ban Same Sex Marriages
Messageif twp people love eachother, let them marry, is that not right??

Date07:25:17, June 13, 2005 CET
FromLiberal Party of Telamon
ToDebating the Ban Same Sex Marriages
Messageits wrong

Date20:08:28, June 13, 2005 CET
FromUnited Liberal Alliance
ToDebating the Ban Same Sex Marriages
MessageAppears that I arrived back just in time!!!!!

Date21:06:00, June 13, 2005 CET
From Federation Under Crazy Killers -- United
ToDebating the Ban Same Sex Marriages
MessageYou're just a homophobe you loser.

Date10:08:03, June 17, 2005 CET
FromTelemon Lutheran Party
ToDebating the Ban Same Sex Marriages
Messageis it that obvious?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 67

no
   

Total Seats: 55

abstain
  

Total Seats: 19


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "The great economic, social and political scientist, Karlstein Metz, accurately predicted over 2,500 years ago that capitalism is doomed to destruction by its inherent weaknesses and contradictions, and must inevitably be replaced by a communist form of social, political and economic organisation." - Friedrich Pfeiffer, former Dorvish politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 67