Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5461
Next month in: 03:46:46
Server time: 00:13:13, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (7): BMsellar | friedrich3 | jamescfm-kaf | Liu Che | Moderation | SocDemDundorfian | VojmatDun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Westmoreland modifing laws

Details

Submitted by[?]: People's Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 4669

Description[?]:

Election treshold Act ( requires 2/3 majority )
Currently: 0%
Proposed: 3%

Pre-school education Act ( simple majority )
Currnetly: undetermined
Proposed:The government maintains a system of free publically owned nurseries alongside unregulated private establishments.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:38:29, July 06, 2019 CET
FromPeople's Party
ToDebating the Westmoreland modifing laws
MessageSince People's Party has majority , but not 2/3 majority in Westmoreland parliament, Pre-school education Act is valid from now on.

Date21:39:42, July 06, 2019 CET
FromPeople's Party
ToDebating the Westmoreland modifing laws
MessageShare your thoughts on Election treshold Act I just need one party to agree here.

Date21:44:17, July 06, 2019 CET
FromPeople's Party
ToDebating the Westmoreland modifing laws
MessageFor state laws we won't proceed to vote since in State Parliaments some parties have more and others have less seats compared to Federal People's Assembly. Each party will post only yes or no to each proposed Act.

Date21:52:01, July 06, 2019 CET
FromOne Nation, One People!
ToDebating the Westmoreland modifing laws
MessageIt would be easier to proceed to vote. It's easier to see than post "yes or "no"

Date21:53:06, July 06, 2019 CET
FromWhite Front Monarchist Party
ToDebating the Westmoreland modifing laws
Messageyeah I agree

Date21:54:39, July 06, 2019 CET
FromPeople's Party
ToDebating the Westmoreland modifing laws
MessageBut it would be more confusing. For some laws it would be seem that they didn't pass although they did just because of differenet seating comparing to Federal level

Date21:56:21, July 06, 2019 CET
FromPeople's Party
ToDebating the Westmoreland modifing laws
MessageWF - You agree to Election Treshold Act? You don't need to agree to the second because I have majority in Westmoreland

Date21:58:50, July 06, 2019 CET
FromOne Nation, One People!
ToDebating the Westmoreland modifing laws
MessageConfusing a bit maybe but at least wyou would have less abstentions.

Date23:49:44, July 06, 2019 CET
FromWhite Front Monarchist Party
ToDebating the Westmoreland modifing laws
Messagei agreed with ONOP on this one

Date00:21:15, November 22, 2019 CET
From Moderation
ToDebating the Westmoreland modifing laws
MessageOOC: Archiving.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 256

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
       

    Total Seats: 244


    Random fact: Players have a responsibility to make a reasonable effort to be accurate when communicating the rules to other players. Any player who manipulatively misleads another player about the rules will be subject to sanction.

    Random quote: "The one bonus of not lifting the ban on gays in the military is that the next time the government mandates a draft we can all declare homosexuality instead of running off to Canada." - Lorne Bloch

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 61