We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Environment Act of 4613
Details
Submitted by[?]: Patriots Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 4614
Description[?]:
| We must protect nature without impeding economic growth. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: There is a national agency which exists side-by-side with commercial forestry companies.
Current: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Proposed: There is a national agency which owns all forests, but subcontracts the work to private companies.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government agricultural and farming subsidies policy.
Old value:: The government subsidises agriculture based on market demand for the crop being grown.
Current: The government subsidises the operations of low-income farming families.
Proposed: The government subsidises the operations of low-income farming families.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The research and development of pharmaceutical drugs.
Old value:: The government subsidizes research and development of prescription drugs and regulates their prices.
Current: The government subsidizes research and development of prescription drugs and regulates their prices.
Proposed: The government subsidizes research and development of prescription drugs but does not regulate their prices.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:33:10, August 04, 2019 CET | From | Conservative Right | To | Debating the Environment Act of 4613 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, We ask for a change to the first proposal at a later date |
| Date | 16:07:14, August 04, 2019 CET | From | Socialist Party | To | Debating the Environment Act of 4613 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, The first proposal is going in the good direction. The second one is not exactly what the CPL wants but that is also in the good direction. The third one is a social regression. Summing up all this, we will abstain on this proposal. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 273 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 147 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 180 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "Poverty is the parent of revolution and crime." - Aristotle |