Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5461
Next month in: 01:27:47
Server time: 14:32:12, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Autokrator30 | HopesFor | Liu Che | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Union act of 4615

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Right

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 4616

Description[?]:

With the passing of the bill. The government will let no longer have ownership over the unions and the new board members will be sitting on two year terms.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:43:20, August 07, 2019 CET
FromWhite Rose
ToDebating the Union act of 4615
MessageMr Speaker,

It was always a temporary measure, to deal with a Political Party of this Diet using the Unions to order a general strike against an elected majority Government because they lost a vote in this Diet.

Now the political grip on the Trade Unions, of any Political Party, has been removed, just as we removed it when it was the other way round during the Coalition with the CPL and SDP.

We are also tempted to call for an enquiry, as our law states no sympathy strikes, workers may only strike for their own pay and conditions, and also a ballot must be held where a majority of all members, not just those that vote, must support it. We have seen no evidence of these requirements being met! This could mean individuals in Unions and Parties have broken the law and committed offences.

Date23:43:26, August 07, 2019 CET
FromWhite Rose
ToDebating the Union act of 4615
MessageMr Speaker,

It was always a temporary measure, to deal with a Political Party of this Diet using the Unions to order a general strike against an elected majority Government because they lost a vote in this Diet.

Now the political grip on the Trade Unions, of any Political Party, has been removed, just as we removed it when it was the other way round during the Coalition with the CPL and SDP.

We are also tempted to call for an enquiry, as our law states no sympathy strikes, workers may only strike for their own pay and conditions, and also a ballot must be held where a majority of all members, not just those that vote, must support it. We have seen no evidence of these requirements being met! This could mean individuals in Unions and Parties have broken the law and committed offences.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
       

Total Seats: 600

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain

      Total Seats: 0


      Random fact: Players who deliberately attempt to present a misleading picture of the nation's current RP laws will be subject to sanction.

      Random quote: "A prince never lacks legitimate reasons to break his promise." - Niccolo Machiavelli

      This page was generated with PHP
      Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
      Queries performed: 43