We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Removal of Cultural Subsidies
Details
Submitted by[?]: Libertarian Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2210
Description[?]:
| A bill to eradicate cultural subsidies. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change National, cultural and historic sites and monuments.
Old value:: The state actively protects scenery, localities, cultural, and historical sites; it maintains an agency to preserve them untouched if public interest so requires.
Current: The state actively protects scenery, localities, cultural, and historical sites; it maintains an agency to preserve them untouched if public interest so requires.
Proposed: The state does not undertake any action towards the protection of cultural and historical heritage.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards the funding of libraries.
Old value:: The national government controls a vast and comprehensive system of public libraries.
Current: Funding and operation of libraries is left entirely to local governments.
Proposed: Books may only be obtained through private dealers.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning museum funding.
Old value:: The national government maintains a system of museums nationwide.
Current: The national government maintains a system of museums nationwide.
Proposed: The government does not fund or manage museums. This is left to the private sector.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:08:33, April 01, 2006 CET | From |  Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Removal of Cultural Subsidies |
| Message | I the cultural heritage of the nation has a good business plan it needs no subsidy, if it does not then it does not deservea a subsidy. The motto is clear, this is a busniess environment, survive or die! Government should not intervene. |
| Date | 22:58:58, April 04, 2006 CET | From | Democratic-Republican Party | To | Debating the Removal of Cultural Subsidies |
| Message | History is important. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 79 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 213 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 38 |
| Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, special care must be taken to ensure realism is maintained when role-playing a government controlled by an ethnic and/or religious minority. If it is to be supposed that this government is supported by a majority of the population, then this should be plausibly and sufficiently role-played. The burden of proof is on the player or players role-playing such a regime to demonstrate that it is being done realistically |
| Random quote: "A politician who is poor is a poor politician." - Carlos Hank Gonzalez |