We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Call for early elections, August 2065
Details
Submitted by[?]: Republican Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill requests an early election. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline. Elections will be held immediately if the bill passes.
Voting deadline: April 2066
Description[?]:
| We, the Liberal Life Party, call for early elections as soon as possible in order to fill vacant seats and to reach a consensus. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:14:16, June 12, 2005 CET |
From | Republican Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, August 2065 | | Message | There were 4 when I put this up to vote, but I do not believe that is your real reason for being against this.
Seven seats are empty, by being against this special election, you are depriving them of representation. |
| Date | 11:06:25, June 12, 2005 CET |
From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, August 2065 | | Message | LLP: I do not appreciate the insinuation. In the past, the LFP has always been the one to call early elections to fill vacancies - even when the party without seats was the Fascist Party. We are committed to democracy, regardless of whether we agree with the party in question.
For your case, this would be a moot point, since I'll wager we'll agree more often than not. |
| Date | 18:06:39, June 12, 2005 CET |
From | Republican Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, August 2065 | | Message | Then I just do not see the reasoning behind you being against this. The things will go back to debate and we'll be able to vote on them again. None of the things up there are of extreme national importance, hell, I even have a bill up for vote.
The empty seats are worth more than a few more months of time spent to reopen voting. |
| Date | 22:54:05, June 12, 2005 CET |
From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, August 2065 | | Message | Actually, come to think of it, we'll agree.
LLP, I'll have you know. Our reasons for disagreeing weren't political, but our reasons for hopping the fence are. Does that make you proud? |
| Date | 12:39:27, June 13, 2005 CET |
From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, August 2065 | | Message | I was voting no because I wanted the presently voted on bills to go through. I wanted to streamline things, make them more efficient.
I'm voting yes now because it will derail some of the bills being voted on, like the ambiguous immigration one. |
subscribe to this discussion -
unsubscribeVoting
| Vote |
Seats |
| yes | Total Seats: 125 |
| no | Total Seats: 68 |
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: When elections in a country are held, all bills in the voting phase are reset to the debate phase. |
| Random quote: "A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks." - Thomas Jefferson |