Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5470
Next month in: 02:39:19
Server time: 21:20:40, April 16, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): AethanKal | GLNBei | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Questions to the Prime Minister 4631-4634

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Renew

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 4635

Description[?]:

Member of the parliament may ask questions to the prime minister. All questions will be answered in order received

OOC: I figure this would increase rp in the country and if we would want to see this continued we will archive all the questions after each session (election)

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:18:10, September 11, 2019 CET
FromUnited Civic Bloc
ToDebating the Questions to the Prime Minister 4631-4634
MessageWhy did the Prime Minister and the government vote against No-Confidence Act? The vote of no confidence is an important element of our parliamentary democracy and the constitution should allowe to make a no-confidence vote and regulate it. We may be able to assure you that you are afraid that we will make it, but we can assure you that UBC does not want to give a vote of no confidence. So can the Prime Minister explain why he is against it and if he would be willing to vote for it with our promise to not table a motion of no-confidence?

Elvira Rawson MP
Leader of the Opposition

Date21:37:19, September 11, 2019 CET
FromConservative Renew
ToDebating the Questions to the Prime Minister 4631-4634
MessageMr. Speaker,

I and my party cannot support the bill. The simple reason is that the bill requires 2/3 support from the parliament in order to have confidence. Which makes confidence extremely difficult to have and will create a Perpetual system of no-confidence votes with virtually no change. We may see early elections more often an unstable government become frequent. Quite simply this does not meet the semblance of realistic expectations that is required in a law! That is why I am voting against the bill and that is why my party is will vote against the bill.

Xavier Unetta
Prime Minister

Date22:56:18, September 11, 2019 CET
FromGaduridos Freedom Party
ToDebating the Questions to the Prime Minister 4631-4634
MessageWith Cecilia Xu voted out as party leader of the LUP and their subsequent rebranding as the Socialist Union for Democracy, is the government at risk?

Juan Costa
GFP Vice Leader

Date01:49:06, September 12, 2019 CET
FromConservative Renew
ToDebating the Questions to the Prime Minister 4631-4634
MessageMr Speaker,

I share similar concerns with my right honorable friend about the future of this government. Yet I am optimistic and confident that this government is the best government for this country at this time! The three promises I made when starting the job have come to completion. This government has shown that promises made are Promises Kept! And with all the disunity and identity crisis going on in opposition benches I can't think of a better government to lead this country foward!

Xavier Unetta
Prime Minister

Date16:12:20, September 12, 2019 CET
FromSocialist Union for Democracy (NPEC)
ToDebating the Questions to the Prime Minister 4631-4634
MessageThe SUD would like to say it will not withdraw from being the C&S of the government until the next elections.

Matinelle Sanchez,
Leader of the SUD

Date03:10:30, September 15, 2019 CET
FromConservative Renew
ToDebating the Questions to the Prime Minister 4631-4634
MessageOCC: Archiving

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 250

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar).

    Random quote: "This country has far more problems than it deserves and far more solutions than it applies." - Ralph Nader

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 57