We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nationalisation Act: Phase I (2209)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Deltarian Nationalist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2211
Description[?]:
| The government should not be brought into question over eminent domain settlements. The compensations will always be fair and slightly above market value. Compensation disagreements could slow down the progress of vital building works. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent domain compensation (if eminent domain is legal).
Old value:: The government determines compensation for victims of eminent domain; victims can sue if they deem it unfair.
Current: A neutral body appointed by the courts determines the compensation, either party may appeal.
Proposed: The government determines compensation for victims of eminent domain.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:49:00, April 03, 2006 CET | From | National Imperial Hobrazian Front | To | Debating the Nationalisation Act: Phase I (2209) |
| Message | Aye. |
| Date | 10:43:03, April 03, 2006 CET | From | United Blobs | To | Debating the Nationalisation Act: Phase I (2209) |
| Message | Nay |
| Date | 10:44:01, April 03, 2006 CET | From | United Blobs | To | Debating the Nationalisation Act: Phase I (2209) |
| Message | Nay |
| Date | 10:47:21, April 03, 2006 CET | From | Deltarian Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Nationalisation Act: Phase I (2209) |
| Message | I'll keep this until after the election. |
| Date | 10:50:42, April 03, 2006 CET | From | Deltarian Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Nationalisation Act: Phase I (2209) |
| Message | Article 1 is the most important to me, i could leave out article 2. |
| Date | 13:39:37, April 03, 2006 CET | From | National Imperial Hobrazian Front | To | Debating the Nationalisation Act: Phase I (2209) |
| Message | I'm not as keen on article one as I am the second. |
| Date | 14:16:58, April 03, 2006 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the Nationalisation Act: Phase I (2209) |
| Message | I'll support article 1, but not 2. |
| Date | 19:15:11, April 04, 2006 CET | From | Deltarian Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Nationalisation Act: Phase I (2209) |
| Message | Hrm, how about two seperate bills? |
| Date | 23:56:51, April 04, 2006 CET | From | We Say So! Party | To | Debating the Nationalisation Act: Phase I (2209) |
| Message | Whether it was one or two bills, our support for each article would remain as mentioned, however it would be noted that we would most likely vote against this in its present form. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 182 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 218 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The voters enjoy active parties who take upon themselves the initiative to create laws. |
| Random quote: "The empires of the future are the empires of the mind." - Winston Churchill |