Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5461
Next month in: 02:18:17
Server time: 17:41:42, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): HopesFor | Maarten_saridan | starfruit | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Expansion of Parliament Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Free Democratic Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2066

Description[?]:

Given that there are two new parties in Aloria, this Bill aims to increase the number of seats in Parliament to allow for a fairer and more accurate representation of the wishes of the people with regards to the allocation of seats to parties.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:06:22, June 12, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian Party
ToDebating the Expansion of Parliament Act
MessageAgainst, there is no need for further increasing seats number. However wat we need is more direct democrac and not more representants!

Date00:50:56, June 13, 2005 CET
FromFree Democratic Party
ToDebating the Expansion of Parliament Act
Messagemore representatives means a greater check on executive power, reducing their ability to centralise.

Date08:46:37, June 13, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian Party
ToDebating the Expansion of Parliament Act
MessageHow exactly?

Absolute number is uninteresting and unimportant. What is important is the relative power of each party in percentage.

Date10:08:49, June 13, 2005 CET
FromFree Democratic Party
ToDebating the Expansion of Parliament Act
MessageGiven that there are now 2 more parties, this will allow a more accurate representation. For example a party with 30.5% of the vote may get more seats than 30.5% under our current system. Since we now have 10 parties rather than 8, it would make sense to increase the number of seats so that they will be divided fairly among the parties. I could have proposed an increase to 700 but that would have been inaccurate too. 500 is the optimum number.

Date12:19:35, June 13, 2005 CET
From Aloria Green Socialist Party
ToDebating the Expansion of Parliament Act
MessageI'm all for an increase in seats.

Date17:27:58, June 13, 2005 CET
From Fair Capitalism Party
ToDebating the Expansion of Parliament Act
MessageUs too.

Date01:06:27, June 14, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian Party
ToDebating the Expansion of Parliament Act
MessageIt seems to me that either you people don't understand the theory of politics or you are just uanble to catch the fact that absolute number is unimportant.

30% is always 30%, whether it's 50 or 300. However when 30% = 300 I know this country is fucking spending money of its citizens and that is clearly inacceptable.

Direct democracy not <strong>over-representation</strong>!

Date01:07:29, June 14, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian Party
ToDebating the Expansion of Parliament Act
MessageI wanted to say WASTING money, not spending. That is exactly a waste of money. Throwing them to mouths of lazy representatives.

Date11:24:35, June 14, 2005 CET
FromFree Democratic Party
ToDebating the Expansion of Parliament Act
MessageThe fact that you resort to swearing highlights the weakness of your argument. If you object to this so much, why not remove representation all together. 30% will not = 300, and the extra 100 seats will ensure a greater accuracy in allocation of seats, ensuring that every vote counts, a principle underpinning democracy.

Date16:46:15, June 14, 2005 CET
From Aloria Green Socialist Party
ToDebating the Expansion of Parliament Act
MessageIt's a poor argument LP- the crux of the matter is representation.

Date17:37:33, June 14, 2005 CET
From Fair Capitalism Party
ToDebating the Expansion of Parliament Act
MessageYes, if you werew to have, say, five seats, they would be one per region, and hardly anybody's views get through. If there are 500, it means there are small constituencies so more views can be conveyed.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 183

no
 

Total Seats: 47

abstain
  

Total Seats: 125


Random fact: Before creating a party organisation, check to see whether there are any existing organisations which cover the same agenda.

Random quote: "Fascism is a religion. The twentieth century will be known in history as the century of fascism." - Benito Mussolini

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 64