Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5461
Next month in: 02:16:13
Server time: 01:43:46, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Neo_kami | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Non lethal police

Details

Submitted by[?]: Democratic Workers Commune

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2067

Description[?]:

police should not have the right to kill

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:33:56, June 12, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Non lethal police
Messagewe had this debate for about a million times... why do you keep trying... it wont pass!

Date12:15:13, June 12, 2005 CET
FromVuloch Ca Korzia
ToDebating the Non lethal police
MessageI support this of course.

Date18:39:07, June 12, 2005 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Non lethal police
MessageI would also support this bill

Date04:15:07, June 13, 2005 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the Non lethal police
MessageNo no no no no no NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Date18:53:41, June 13, 2005 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Non lethal police
MessageIt sad to see the Stalinist Party in power and supporting the use of military grade weapons for police.

Date21:50:00, June 13, 2005 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Non lethal police
MessageBloody fascists more like, giving the constabulary guns will only lead to a police state!

Date03:25:27, June 14, 2005 CET
FromDemocratic Workers Commune
ToDebating the Non lethal police
MessageI agree, will anyone agree to a comprimise, standard firearms?

Date03:25:55, June 14, 2005 CET
FromDemocratic Workers Commune
ToDebating the Non lethal police
MessageI agree, will anyone agree to a comprimise, standard firearms?

Date03:26:27, June 14, 2005 CET
FromDemocratic Workers Commune
ToDebating the Non lethal police
Messagesorry for the double post

Date08:44:30, June 14, 2005 CET
FromVuloch Ca Korzia
ToDebating the Non lethal police
MessageNo. Keep this up and eventually it will go through.

Date12:00:03, June 14, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Non lethal police
Messageto the SDP: this isn't an ideological issue more of a social issue. And i'm castroist so you know it.

Date12:04:19, June 14, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Non lethal police
Messagealso you can see previous debates to see my resouning on this issue (and this is like the 20th time they tried...)

Date15:54:40, June 14, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Non lethal police
MessageAnd to CoL: this is the i dont know what time it is that you use the word fascist in the wrong context!

http://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/works/1944/1944-fas.htm

Date22:17:56, June 14, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Non lethal police
Messageand it will not lead to a police state every RL nation has lethal guns and almost none is a police state...

Date23:35:12, June 14, 2005 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Non lethal police
MessageI will not comprimise with an evil Stalinist/fascist , who don't believe in Communist, but believes in himself being well off, in State-Capitalism and inslaving the workers.

Date00:32:58, June 15, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Non lethal police
Messageyes, yes shut up idiot! seriously you dont seem to know what you are talking about this is a moral issue nothing ideological!

Date00:34:14, June 15, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Non lethal police
Messageif i would be "Stalinist" (as in your interpetation of Stalinist) i would have had much more power already...

Date00:38:05, June 15, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Non lethal police
Messagewell then allright forgive me that was not nice of me to say all these things... now i will give a normal responce: 1. Stalinism is an interpetation of Marxism-Leninism and there is nothing un-communist about that also if i was a fascist i would believe weak people in society should just die, and if you know my party history and my voting history you would know i am not also please read this article about fascism: http://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/works/1944/1944-fas.htm Second if i believed in myself being better off i would have voted rather different and as i have said before i would have had much more power. State-Capitalism is a term used by Slachtchaunists which i disagree with. But thats a whole other debate.

Date00:42:21, June 15, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Non lethal police
MessageThen about the issue itself; i have already refered to previous debate but since you are pretty lazy and probably haven't i will say it all again: Criminals have lethal weapons and Police will only shoot with lethal weapons when the criminals have one they should be able to defend themselves. I would think twice as a criminal if i knew the cops would be able to kill me. This does not breach civil rights in any way since cops are just law ENFORCERS so unless you would pass some idiotic law giving much power to cops this will not turn into a police state. Off course when the police has to deal with small crimes they will not make use of any military-grade weapons or possibly not of any weapons at all. Furthermore i think you are an idiot who refuses to even listen to it's opposition and just yells STALINIST and FASCIST without thinking. And that does not make you look smart, the one who is more "stalinist" (as in your interpetation) is you since you ignore other opinions and hate everybody with other opinions!

Date00:43:37, June 15, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Non lethal police
Messageread: you are intolerant towards other idea's!

Date00:45:09, June 15, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Non lethal police
Messagealso extra note: this really pissed me off so dont expect any seats in any further coalitions while i'm in power!

Date03:47:21, June 15, 2005 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the Non lethal police
MessageBAM BIATCH! LBSC has turned the tables in favour of the No vote!

Date12:58:53, June 15, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Non lethal police
Messageand to DWC: i will not compromise, since the police needs these weapons in certain cases and i will not risk any life of a police officer beceause of some idiotic law that i myself have voted yes upon!

Date13:08:29, June 15, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Non lethal police
MessageOHW NO WE ARE RUNING A POLICE STATE FOR ABOUT 60 YEARS! THEN HOW COMES PEOPLE CNA SPEAK OUT AGAINST THISE POLICE STAT? RATHER ODD? (sorry just felt like it :P)

Date13:08:57, June 15, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Non lethal police
Messagecorrection: 30 years there was only a small period of time without military grade weapons...

Date14:23:43, June 15, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian party of Darnussia
ToDebating the Non lethal police
Messagewhat a pitty the voters cant read our debates...

Date18:51:55, June 15, 2005 CET
FromVuloch Ca Korzia
ToDebating the Non lethal police
MessageWhy not wait until you know what you're going to say and then condense it into one post?

Date20:50:12, June 15, 2005 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the Non lethal police
MessageNot as awesome.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 338

no
    

Total Seats: 412

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: "Jezvraljogadsrlji" means "Social" in the Jelbic languages.

Random quote: "Communism, like any other revealed religion, is largely made up of prophecies." - H. L. Mencken

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 94