Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5460
Next month in: 00:00:48
Server time: 15:59:11, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Reverse Attempts 2211

Details

Submitted by[?]: Atlas

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2219

Description[?]:

Resolution.
Once a vote is won on an issue, no opposing party will attempt to reverse the decision by reopening the same debate or by forcing a second vote on the same issue within the same cabinet period.
Reversal attempts will not be started before the next cabinet is formed.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:01:26, April 07, 2006 CET
FromAtlas
ToDebating the Reverse Attempts 2211
MessageThis would function as a gentlemen's agreement between the signing parties.

Date15:16:20, April 07, 2006 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Reverse Attempts 2211
MessageHere's a question, what if we do not have a new cabinet but the old one stays? Then what?

Date16:28:41, April 07, 2006 CET
FromSocial-Conservative party
ToDebating the Reverse Attempts 2211
MessageWe support

Date17:12:28, April 07, 2006 CET
FromAtlas
ToDebating the Reverse Attempts 2211
MessageTo answer the question of the RP : we are talking periods. If the next cabinet period has a similar coalition as the past one, attempts to reverse decisions may start.


Date17:29:50, April 07, 2006 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Reverse Attempts 2211
Messagedespite the fact that it is precisely the same cabinet. What you are saying is that each election cycle, it is only one vote per bill per election cycle.

Date17:30:29, April 07, 2006 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Reverse Attempts 2211
MessageSo what if some one misses a vote and wants that opportunity to vote on it? This resolution would punish them. I do not see the merits in that.

If this is passed, I will not abide by it.

Date05:02:57, April 08, 2006 CET
FromAtlas
ToDebating the Reverse Attempts 2211
MessageWe are amazed to see the RP willing to restrict and regulate everything big and small, except their own behaviour :)

Date10:17:45, April 08, 2006 CET
FromSocial-Conservative party
ToDebating the Reverse Attempts 2211
MessageThe Rightish party never respects laws as they say. They only follow those laws that fit them. Thank God we do not have selective parties in government whom have laws that they choose not to follow. The RP apparently wish people to have individual views on laws, and then decide which ones are "worth" to follow.

Date16:30:45, April 08, 2006 CET
FromPatriot Party
ToDebating the Reverse Attempts 2211
MessageLast time I checked, they are more law abiding than the ONCP who has violated the law on several occassions.

Date19:53:19, April 08, 2006 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Reverse Attempts 2211
Messagetalk about slander.

Date21:42:59, April 08, 2006 CET
FromOne Nation Socialist Party
ToDebating the Reverse Attempts 2211
Messagewhat laws did we violate? no written laws have ever been violated by us!

Date21:43:12, April 08, 2006 CET
FromOne Nation Socialist Party
ToDebating the Reverse Attempts 2211
Messagewhat laws did we violate? no written laws have ever been violated by us!

Date21:43:31, April 08, 2006 CET
FromOne Nation Socialist Party
ToDebating the Reverse Attempts 2211
Messagewhat laws did we violate? no written laws have ever been violated by us!

Date22:14:55, April 08, 2006 CET
FromAtlas
ToDebating the Reverse Attempts 2211
MessageCome on gentlemen, we have a country to run. Let us all keep cool ?

Date23:45:41, April 08, 2006 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Reverse Attempts 2211
MessageJust like no written laws have been violated by us and yes you have. I point to you your dead naked colleagues who are not part of a nudist colony.

Date01:45:10, April 09, 2006 CET
FromAtlas
ToDebating the Reverse Attempts 2211
MessageLoL !

Date11:51:17, April 09, 2006 CET
FromSocial-Conservative party
ToDebating the Reverse Attempts 2211
MessageSlander ? So it is slander to say that if a law " is passed, I will not abide by it." means that you are not law-abiding... ok.. nice theory.

Date12:03:48, April 09, 2006 CET
FromAtlas
ToDebating the Reverse Attempts 2211
MessageNah, this wouldn't be a law. It's a gentlemen's agreement. If only the RP could see the world as an association of gentlemen :)

Date12:45:27, April 09, 2006 CET
FromSocial-Conservative party
ToDebating the Reverse Attempts 2211
MessageSo what you are saying is that the Rightish party is not gentlemen ? :D

Date19:16:56, April 09, 2006 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Reverse Attempts 2211
MessageSCP, this isn't a law anyway. Its a resolution. Nothing more nothing less.

Date19:17:20, April 09, 2006 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Reverse Attempts 2211
MessageI do not see an article in the Resolution that makes this resolution binding.

Date00:00:53, April 10, 2006 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the Reverse Attempts 2211
MessageOOC:
Just a small announcement. Due to circumstances I couldn't acces the internet for the last few days, so I missed 4 bills being voted.

Date00:22:21, April 10, 2006 CET
FromAtlas
ToDebating the Reverse Attempts 2211
MessageWe decided this 'gentlemen' resolution makes no sense if there is no unanimity.
We are disappointed by the lack of enthousiasm for our efforts to make government more effcient.
We will remove the resolution from the agenda in due time.

Date02:13:52, April 10, 2006 CET
FromPatriot Party
ToDebating the Reverse Attempts 2211
MessageIf this is a gentleman's agreement then I guess I do not have to abide by it :D

Date09:20:22, April 10, 2006 CET
FromAtlas
ToDebating the Reverse Attempts 2211
MessageMake it a gentlemind's agreement.

Date14:55:22, April 10, 2006 CET
FromRightist Party
ToDebating the Reverse Attempts 2211
MessageWhat the heck is a gentlemind? Don't you mean gentlepeople?

Date16:12:30, April 10, 2006 CET
FromGreenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the Reverse Attempts 2211
MessageI guess it's a play of words.. :-$

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 215

no
   

Total Seats: 284

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: To see what other nations are up to and to actively involve yourself in international activities: check the Roleplaying section on the forum! Don't be shy to make a news post about your party's recent achievements.

Random quote: "A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to mean is worthless." - Antonin Scalia

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 88