Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5472
Next month in: 01:58:52
Server time: 18:01:07, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): burgerboys | DanivonX | Nileowen_Kir | SE33 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: EAPP Southern Camarilla: the Council Scheme of 4698

Details

Submitted by[?]: Prince-Republican League - New EAPP

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 4699

Description[?]:

Under the less politically minded Princes there's always a shadowy group or five that rise above all others and dictate the details of everyday political life. In this particular case, those orders seem to originate from a few merry brotherhoods of Southern nobles.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:53:28, January 19, 2020 CET
FromLodamese Democratic Progressive Party
ToDebating the EAPP Southern Camarilla: the Council Scheme of 4698
MessageMr. Speaker,

Our party will abstain from voting for this proposal. There are articles we support, namely the articles on profit sharing and employee representation on corporate boards, but they are mixed with the rest of which we oppose. Should this not pass, we would gladly bring to the floor or vote in favor of legislation that have the aforementioned articles by themselves.

Martin Moray,
GPP Leader

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 177

no
   

Total Seats: 248

abstain
   

Total Seats: 320


Random fact: "Doxxing", or the publishing of personally identifiable information about another player without permission, is forbidden.

Random quote: "A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to mean is worthless." - Antonin Scalia

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 72