Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5474
Next month in: 01:02:00
Server time: 18:57:59, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): SE33 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The farmers Act of 4698

Details

Submitted by[?]: Party of 1776

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 4699

Description[?]:

Current laws dealing with farm ownership and Financial support are below-

Government agricultural and farming subsidies policy.

All agricultural operations are state-owned and operated.

Alternatives:

The government denies subsidy assistance to farmers.
The government allows local governments to craft agricultural subsidy policy.
The government subsidises the operations of low-income farming families.
The government subsidises agriculture based on market demand for the crop being grown.
Agricultural crops which are considered beneficial to the enviroment or to the continued ecological safety of the state are subsidized.
Strategic crops are produced on State owned farms. All other produce is left to the Private sector.

We believe The government subsidises the operations of low-income farming families.

The right to farm and own your own farm is a right that is given and passed on from generation to generation , It is an infringement of our great peoples rights to have all operations owned by the state . On top of this its costly . Were not saying the state cant own some operations but definetly not all.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:03:09, January 20, 2020 CET
FromConservative Republican Party
ToDebating the The farmers Act of 4698
Messagewe agree.

Date19:21:29, January 20, 2020 CET
FromDemocratic Party of Likatonia
ToDebating the The farmers Act of 4698
MessageWe strongly agree

Date19:37:11, January 20, 2020 CET
FromConservative Republican Party
ToDebating the The farmers Act of 4698
MessageWe agree more strongly than the Social Dems

Date01:32:45, January 21, 2020 CET
FromParty of 1776
ToDebating the The farmers Act of 4698
MessageOutstanding , we are glad we could all agree for once.

Date19:53:10, January 21, 2020 CET
FromLikatonia First
ToDebating the The farmers Act of 4698
MessageWe agree to, We should let private companies run farms if they want to

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 493

no
 

Total Seats: 182

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: It is possible for a player to transfer ownership of a character or a royal house to another player. This should be done in a public way, such as on the Character Transfers thread, so that if a dispute arises in the future, Moderation can be pointed towards evidence of the transfer.

Random quote: "Catch a man a fish, and you can sell it to him. Teach a man to fish, and you ruin a wonderful business opportunity." - Karl Marx

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 56