We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Protecting Our Docs
Details
Submitted by[?]: Republican Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2213
Description[?]:
| Why should our doctors be destroyed by frivolous law suits? Allow an actual MEDICAL body to decide if something went wrong and requires reparations. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Malpractice suits.
Old value:: Malpractice suits may be brought against doctors.
Current: Malpractice suits may be brought against doctors.
Proposed: Only a medical regulatory body can prosecute a doctor for malpractice.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:20:10, April 08, 2006 CET | From | Fenner Brockway Socialist Party | To | Debating the Protecting Our Docs |
| Message | We're in two minds about it but in our experience, medical regulatory bodies tend to be dominated by the medical profession and insufficiently independent from it. |
| Date | 12:15:38, April 09, 2006 CET | From |  Ducal Delegation | To | Debating the Protecting Our Docs |
| Message | We will support this. A medical regulatory body will sift the serious cases from the trivial ones. Percy Waterman (Personal Secretary to the Grand Duke of Hikirena) |
| Date | 08:16:47, April 10, 2006 CET | From | Communist Party of Aldegar | To | Debating the Protecting Our Docs |
| Message | A court is unbiased and can decide what is best. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 117 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 216 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 42 |
| Random fact: Players are expected to play the game independently and should not share their passwords or allow others to access their accounts. |
| Random quote: "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong." - Voltaire |