We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of February 4716
Details
Submitted by[?]: Moderate Republican Party (MRP)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 4716
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
As per the Constitution, the President chairs the cabinet.
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Moderate Republican Party (MRP)
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Moderate Republican Party (MRP)
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the National Conservative Party (NCP)
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Rightist Populist Party (RPP)
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Moderate Republican Party (MRP)
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Moderate Republican Party (MRP)
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the National Conservative Party (NCP)
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the National Conservative Party (NCP)
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the National Conservative Party (NCP)
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Rightist Populist Party (RPP)
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Rightist Populist Party (RPP)
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Rightist Populist Party (RPP)
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:33:17, February 25, 2020 CET | From | Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 4716 |
| Message | We vote no and others should vote no as well. The people of Baltusia don’t want the MRP in power hence why they’ve been losing votes and we’ve been gaining votes in return. This is why the voters have diverted to us and want the LDP in power because of the many chances MRP got to lead the country but have failed each and every time. Now, they are trying to pass all of these ridiculous bills like this one presented here just to regain power because MRP are so power hungry and all they care about is them being in power rather than let the voters decide and put power before country. |
| Date | 01:34:40, February 25, 2020 CET | From | Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 4716 |
| Message | We vote no and others should vote no as well. The people of Baltusia don’t want the MRP in power hence why they’ve been losing votes and we’ve been gaining votes in return. This is why the voters have diverted to us and want the LDP in power because of the many chances MRP got to lead the country but have failed each and every time. Now, they are trying to pass all of these ridiculous bills like this one presented here just to regain power because MRP are so power hungry and all they care about is them being in power rather than let the voters decide and put power before country. |
| Date | 02:20:38, February 25, 2020 CET | From | Moderate Republican Party (MRP) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 4716 |
| Message | It sounds like the LDP doesn’t want to lose their government positions. The LDP doesn’t have a majority for a reason. The majority of people don’t want the LDP. LDP are the ones truly hunger for power. They are creating false accusations to keep their cabinet positions. We find it inappropriate for the LDP to accuse us of not caring for the people of Baltusia. |
| Date | 09:27:37, February 25, 2020 CET | From | Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 4716 |
| Message | Wrong. It’s the MRP that never wanted to lose their positions in the first place and they clearly cannot stand one bit that we are in power. If the majority of the people don’t want us, then why do we have the most votes? All the MRP is doing is using our own words against us and they’re the ones that should be talking about not having a majority when they have less votes than us. We find it very appropriate to prove that the MRP don’t care for the people of Baltusia because they’ve had a lot more terms to be in power than any other party here and what have they done really? Don’t worry. We’ll wait for the MRP to answer this question. |
| Date | 09:27:38, February 25, 2020 CET | From | Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 4716 |
| Message | Wrong. It’s the MRP that never wanted to lose their positions in the first place and they clearly cannot stand one bit that we are in power. If the majority of the people don’t want us, then why do we have the most votes? All the MRP is doing is using our own words against us and they’re the ones that should be talking about not having a majority when they have less votes than us. We find it very appropriate to prove that the MRP don’t care for the people of Baltusia because they’ve had a lot more terms to be in power than any other party here and what have they done really? Don’t worry. We’ll wait for the MRP to answer this question. |
| Date | 09:29:26, February 25, 2020 CET | From | National Democratic Front [NDF] | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 4716 |
| Message | MRP is trying to work with right wing parties and that is not possible. |
| Date | 13:15:28, February 25, 2020 CET | From | Moderate Republican Party (MRP) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 4716 |
| Message | If Baltusia didn’t want us then please explain to us why our party won the presidency WITHOUT endorsements. We won with 30% of the vote then with 58%. Again without endorsements. Only 25% wanted your party. We have increased the country’s revenue by 500,000 with out tax reform, and have submitted over 49 bills. With at least 50% of them passing while not holding a majority (http://classic.particracy.net/viewpartybills.php?partyid=38821) while the LDP is talking about doing something, they have only submitted 5 bills (http://classic.particracy.net/viewpartybills.php?partyid=38597). |
| Date | 19:00:14, February 25, 2020 CET | From | Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 4716 |
| Message | At least more than 50% of our bills have passed whereas your party just passed bills for your own good. You tried to pass bills that will keep you in power or try to regain power whenever you lost power. We at least never passed bills in which we tried to gain every advantage we could to either gain power or regain power that we lost. We always tried to pass laws concerning this country. And where are your facts about how many percent wanted us and how many bills did you pass exactly? Even the NDF is against your party and you’re down by a two on one advantage. What endorsements are you talking about? Who endorsed who? Where all the facts you’re presenting? Answer us. We have to know. |
| Date | 19:13:29, February 25, 2020 CET | From | Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 4716 |
| Message | Unlike the MRP, we have always voted to every single bill that has been presented for the good of the country. We have never voted to put any party or parties above the citizens of Baltusia. |
| Date | 19:22:32, February 25, 2020 CET | From | Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 4716 |
| Message | MRP is the only party that voted in favor of its own bill of the tax reform and deliberately did not wait for other parties to vote no to the bill in danger of it perhaps not passing. You took away the the NCP’s ability to vote no when they themselves expressed their disagreement towards it. How have you actually increased the country’s revenue by 500,000 with your tax reform might I ask? Even in your cabinet proposals, you have always put yourself above all of us other parties. You have always put yourself to be the Head of Government because you want nothing but complete control. You deliberately voted yes on your own cabinet proposal bills and took away our votes just so you could quickly pass those bills to your own advantage. Also, how do you know who endorsed us? Where is your proof that we got endorsed and we can even be endorsed? Do you have any facts or are you just fabricating this country with lies like you always have? We demand to have answers to these questions as well. |
| Date | 19:31:41, February 25, 2020 CET | From | Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 4716 |
| Message | MRP is also the same party that deliberately tried to pass seat reduction bills so other parties won’t have any representation whatsoever and it will be just them ruling over Baltusia with no tension of dealing with the Opposition whatsoever. |
| Date | 22:33:30, February 25, 2020 CET | From | Moderate Republican Party (MRP) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 4716 |
| Message | No party in Baltusia history has taken these links to attempt to damage and criticize their opponents. The LDP are making false accusations that we pass bills to help ourselves. We are passing bills because we want to get things done unlike other parties. Here is your evidence (http://classic.particracy.net/viewnews.php?newsid=682170). Hope with this evidence you see that we are what the people want. With the popular vote, the people Baltusia prefer us. |
| Date | 00:53:55, February 26, 2020 CET | From | Moderate Republican Party (MRP) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 4716 |
| Message | If the LDP was for the people of Baltusia, they would resign their positions and wait for another cabinet since an election has occur. If they are what they claim to be, that Baltusia wants them, they should have no problem passing a cabinet proposal. |
| Date | 04:47:45, February 26, 2020 CET | From | Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 4716 |
| Message | Why should we resign our positions wait for another corrupt cabinet like yours make way just because you say so? You have no right to tell us what to do and what not to do. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 56 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 48 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 21 |
| Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that. |
| Random quote: "Any law which violates the inalienable rights of man is essentially unjust and tyrannical; it is not a law at all." - Maximilien Robespierre |