We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Police Supply Reform Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Sekowan Freedom Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2213
Description[?]:
| Of course, it is reasonable to limit the magnitude of weapons the common police officer may wield, but it is also necessary in certain circumstances to have officers who can handle such weapons as sniper rifles and smoke grenade launchers along with various other high tech weapons. These are very important mostly for SWAT teams that must deal with hostage takers and high speed pursuits. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The weapons used by police forces.
Old value:: Police officers carry standard firearms.
Current: Police officers may only carry non-lethal weapons.
Proposed: Police officers may only carry standard firearms apart from specially trained firearms units.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 84 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 52 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 64 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "[The people] may forget what you said, but they will never forget how you made them feel." - Carl W. Buechner |