We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Likatonian Supreme Court (revised 2nd)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Republican Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 4729
Description[?]:
This bill will establish the supreme court of Likatonia, the supreme court can strike down ats by the senate and pres. but the pres. appoints members of the supreme court and the senate approves them. Article One: The supreme court upholds the law and the constitution however they do not just uphold the law and constitution, and can strike down acts by the Senate, President and Prime Minister, but must suggest a replacement for the senate, if the senate does not uphold the Supreme Courts decision early elections must be called. Article 2: The President will appoint all 7 members to the Supreme court and the senate must approve them by a 2/3 vote, the Supreme Court will have 7 members. Article 3: when appointing a judge the pres. must submit a bill entitled "Supreme Court Nomination" and that bill must contain the name, the age, the political party, gender, home state and any other information the pre. deems appropriate. The bill can also have more than one appointment. Article 4: Judges are responsible to the senate and can be impeached by the senate the impeachment will take 2/3rds of the vote, after the judge is removed a bill must be submitted to replace him. Article5 : their will be a forum page were Supreme Court cases will be held parties control their judges vote and if the courts find a act/law to be unconstitutional the senate must repeal it. Article 6: Anyone can bring a case to the Supreme Court but at least 3 out of the 7 judges must want to hear the case, it will take at least 4 out of 7 judges to repeal an act or law. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 00:53:42, March 21, 2020 CET | From | Conservative Republican Party | To | Debating the Likatonian Supreme Court (revised 2nd) |
Message | I will wait to see what other parties think |
Date | 00:54:18, March 21, 2020 CET | From | Likatonia First | To | Debating the Likatonian Supreme Court (revised 2nd) |
Message | we agree to this |
Date | 00:55:17, March 21, 2020 CET | From | Conservative Republican Party | To | Debating the Likatonian Supreme Court (revised 2nd) |
Message | should PM be able to appoint judges for the senate to approve to? |
Date | 00:56:35, March 21, 2020 CET | From | Likatonia First | To | Debating the Likatonian Supreme Court (revised 2nd) |
Message | I think it should just be a president thing or maybe 4 from President and 3 from PM |
Date | 00:57:59, March 21, 2020 CET | From | Conservative Republican Party | To | Debating the Likatonian Supreme Court (revised 2nd) |
Message | well just make it pres. as the PM is HOG and can do a lot more than the pres. |
Date | 01:02:23, March 21, 2020 CET | From | Democratic Party of Likatonia | To | Debating the Likatonian Supreme Court (revised 2nd) |
Message | President appoints 3, PM 3, Minister IA 1 |
Date | 01:03:26, March 21, 2020 CET | From | Democratic Party of Likatonia | To | Debating the Likatonian Supreme Court (revised 2nd) |
Message | About Article6: for repeal needs to be also 3 rather then 4 |
Date | 01:08:01, March 21, 2020 CET | From | Likatonia First | To | Debating the Likatonian Supreme Court (revised 2nd) |
Message | I am for allpres.as PM and cabinet in genral have more power as they actualy propose the laws. The president is just a figure head with very little power. |
Date | 01:08:44, March 21, 2020 CET | From | Likatonia First | To | Debating the Likatonian Supreme Court (revised 2nd) |
Message | And support current Article 6 |
Date | 01:09:14, March 21, 2020 CET | From | Democratic Party of Likatonia | To | Debating the Likatonian Supreme Court (revised 2nd) |
Message | Ok. But then what President appoints it must be approved by 2/3 of the Senate or 67 seats now. |
Date | 01:10:08, March 21, 2020 CET | From | Likatonia First | To | Debating the Likatonian Supreme Court (revised 2nd) |
Message | Well that is fine as that is what is in the proposal (look at Article 2) |
Date | 01:10:47, March 21, 2020 CET | From | Democratic Party of Likatonia | To | Debating the Likatonian Supreme Court (revised 2nd) |
Message | I thought about bringing on repeal there would need to be at 3 jurries, and 4 of 7 must vote in favour, like simple majority. |
Date | 01:13:59, March 21, 2020 CET | From | Likatonia First | To | Debating the Likatonian Supreme Court (revised 2nd) |
Message | i think that is what is propsed |
Date | 01:15:25, March 21, 2020 CET | From | Democratic Party of Likatonia | To | Debating the Likatonian Supreme Court (revised 2nd) |
Message | I thought that also bringing to an appeal would require 4 jurries to agree |
Date | 01:16:57, March 21, 2020 CET | From | Likatonia First | To | Debating the Likatonian Supreme Court (revised 2nd) |
Message | it is up to the CRP so wait for their response |
Date | 01:36:31, March 21, 2020 CET | From | Conservative Republican Party | To | Debating the Likatonian Supreme Court (revised 2nd) |
Message | their would be no juries, those would be civil cases, We can do the 3 PM 3 PR and 1 IA, and as for article 6 SD 4 is a majority 3 would be to hear the case. |
Date | 01:39:06, March 21, 2020 CET | From | Conservative Republican Party | To | Debating the Likatonian Supreme Court (revised 2nd) |
Message | made the some changes, any new suggestions or is this good? |
Date | 11:00:27, March 21, 2020 CET | From | Likatonia First | To | Debating the Likatonian Supreme Court (revised 2nd) |
Message | I know this is just a nit pick but i am now guessing the pres., PM and IA minister would all have to submit supreme court nomination bills |
Date | 12:06:13, March 21, 2020 CET | From | Democratic Party of Likatonia | To | Debating the Likatonian Supreme Court (revised 2nd) |
Message | It would be better to President submmit 7 nomines, but Parliament would need to approve it by 2/3 majority. It doesn't matter if SD currently has majority. It matters more that 2/3 of parliament need to approve them |
Date | 12:55:12, March 21, 2020 CET | From | Likatonia First | To | Debating the Likatonian Supreme Court (revised 2nd) |
Message | we agree to this |
Date | 18:06:38, March 21, 2020 CET | From | Conservative Republican Party | To | Debating the Likatonian Supreme Court (revised 2nd) |
Message | okay made the adjsutment |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 70 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 30 |
Random fact: Never use the same password as a friend. If two or more active accounts use the same password, they will be inactivated. |
Random quote: "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." - Mark Twain |