We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: SD.GOV.RP:National Supreme Court of Likatonia
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Party of Likatonia
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 4730
Description[?]:
| Name: Paul Erickson Gender: Male Age: 65 Politial Party: CRP Political Position: Right-Wing Main Ideology: Conservative Home State: East Bolton City: Edisville Name:Paul Athule Age:54 Gender:Male State:Pirland City/Town:Aulbia (Town) Political Party:Lab Political position:Far-left/left-wing Political ideology:Socialism Name:Jill Smith Gender:Female Age:45 State:Madison City/Town:Reyno Political Party:Lab Political positionLcentre-left Main political ideology:progressive Name:Richard Singh Age:36 Gender:Male State:West Bolton State:Clovisport Political party:SD Political ideology:Social democracy Political position:Centre-left Name:Pamella Allen Age:72 Gender:Female State:Norwalk City/Town:South Ling (Town) Political Party:SD Political ideology:Left-wing populism/Social conservatism Political position:Left wing Name:King Murray Age:47 Gender:Male State:Madison City/State:Clinton Political Party:SD Political ideologyLiberalism Political position:Centre Name:Emily Jacob Age:31 Gender:Female State:East Bolton City/Town:Broughthood (Town) Political Party:Ind Political ideology:Ultranationalism/Likatonian nationalism Political position:Right-wing/Far-right |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:51:16, March 22, 2020 CET | From | Conservative Republican Party | To | Debating the SD.GOV.RP:National Supreme Court of Likatonia |
| Message | we think the left has to much representation in this proposal |
| Date | 21:58:14, March 22, 2020 CET | From | Democratic Party of Likatonia | To | Debating the SD.GOV.RP:National Supreme Court of Likatonia |
| Message | I can't alow CRP more seats, if other parties have proposed their candidates then we would have maybe fairer representation. Last candidate is independant, she is actually ex-NULP member |
| Date | 21:59:23, March 22, 2020 CET | From | Conservative Republican Party | To | Debating the SD.GOV.RP:National Supreme Court of Likatonia |
| Message | fine, do I at least control the IND vote? because she is right wing |
| Date | 22:06:08, March 22, 2020 CET | From | Democratic Party of Likatonia | To | Debating the SD.GOV.RP:National Supreme Court of Likatonia |
| Message | ind vote can be controlled by any right-wing party, prefferably NULP, but you can also control her if you wish |
| Date | 22:07:53, March 22, 2020 CET | From | Democratic Party of Likatonia | To | Debating the SD.GOV.RP:National Supreme Court of Likatonia |
| Message | I made pamella allen in case she can help with other conservative members although she is economically leftist |
| Date | 22:14:17, March 22, 2020 CET | From | Likatonia First | To | Debating the SD.GOV.RP:National Supreme Court of Likatonia |
| Message | we would approve of this |
| Date | 22:42:45, March 22, 2020 CET | From | Conservative Republican Party | To | Debating the SD.GOV.RP:National Supreme Court of Likatonia |
| Message | okay then we would vote yes, if she is ex-NULP I don't think the NULP should control her, but i might make sense. |
| Date | 23:14:47, March 22, 2020 CET | From | Democratic Party of Likatonia | To | Debating the SD.GOV.RP:National Supreme Court of Likatonia |
| Message | She is controld by you and NULP together. She is making decision on mutual agree, of if there is no agreement: once she is listening to CRP, next time to NULP and etc. |
| Date | 23:15:38, March 22, 2020 CET | From | Conservative Republican Party | To | Debating the SD.GOV.RP:National Supreme Court of Likatonia |
| Message | okay seems reasonable |
| Date | 23:16:45, March 22, 2020 CET | From | Democratic Party of Likatonia | To | Debating the SD.GOV.RP:National Supreme Court of Likatonia |
| Message | The problem is that we don't have 2/3 majority so NULP or SWP must vote in favour |
| Date | 23:24:10, March 22, 2020 CET | From | Conservative Republican Party | To | Debating the SD.GOV.RP:National Supreme Court of Likatonia |
| Message | well, that might be a problem |
| Date | 00:06:38, March 23, 2020 CET | From | Conservative Republican Party | To | Debating the SD.GOV.RP:National Supreme Court of Likatonia |
| Message | just for the record these are the 6 articles of the Supreme Court Article One: The supreme court upholds the law and the constitution however they do not just uphold the law and constitution, and can strike down acts by the Senate, President and Prime Minister, but must suggest a replacement for the senate, if the senate does not uphold the Supreme Courts decision early elections must be called. Article 2: The President will appoint all 7 members to the Supreme court and the senate must approve them by a 2/3 vote, the Supreme Court will have 7 members. Article 3: when appointing a judge the pres. must submit a bill entitled "Supreme Court Nomination" and that bill must contain the name, the age, the political party, gender, home state and any other information the pre. deems appropriate. The bill can also have more than one appointment. Article 4: Judges are responsible to the senate and can be impeached by the senate the impeachment will take 2/3rds of the vote, after the judge is removed a bill must be submitted to replace him. Article5 : their will be a forum page were Supreme Court cases will be held parties control their judges vote and if the courts find a act/law to be unconstitutional the senate must repeal it. Article 6: Anyone can bring a case to the Supreme Court but at least 3 out of the 7 judges must want to hear the case, it will take at least 4 out of 7 judges to repeal an act or law. |
| Date | 00:11:41, March 23, 2020 CET | From | Democratic Party of Likatonia | To | Debating the SD.GOV.RP:National Supreme Court of Likatonia |
| Message | I know. I have carefully read that. But they didn't submit their candidates on time |
| Date | 02:42:30, March 23, 2020 CET | From | National Union for Likatonian Prosperity | To | Debating the SD.GOV.RP:National Supreme Court of Likatonia |
| Message | This is really reducing the Executive power to a phenomenal amount. |
| Date | 02:45:22, March 23, 2020 CET | From | National Union for Likatonian Prosperity | To | Debating the SD.GOV.RP:National Supreme Court of Likatonia |
| Message | But since, I have no positions in any office of the country. I will give you the 2/3rd majority because it does nothing to me. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 87 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 13 |
| Random fact: Character names must appear plausible and should consist of at least a first name and a surname. Exceptions to this will only be granted at Moderation's discretion and where a very strong case has been presented |
| Random quote: "The substance of the eminent Socialist gentlemen's speech is that making a profit is a sin. It is my belief that the real sin is taking a loss!" - Winston Churchill |