We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Trade Unions Act 4730
Details
Submitted by[?]: White Rose
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 4731
Description[?]:
An Act to allow firing of illegal strikers and to limit trade unions to ensure democracy |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Employer's rights in regards to firing striking workers.
Old value:: Employers cannot fire workers who have gone on strike.
Current: Employers cannot fire workers who have gone on strike.
Proposed: Government approval is needed before strikers can be fired.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Closed shops are places of employment where only members of a specific union are allowed to work; union shops can hire non-members, but these have to become members after a certain time; agency shops can hire non-members, who have to pay a fee to cover the unions costs. All three are erected by union agreements. (Only valid if unions are legal)
Old value:: Closed shops, union shops and agency shops are legal.
Current: Only open shops are legal.
Proposed: Only open shops are legal.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 10:42:35, March 24, 2020 CET | From | Left for Progress | To | Debating the Trade Unions Act 4730 |
Message | Mr. Speaker, This is pathetic and ridiculous. We strike If this illegal, too. What largest corporation's command is this? Respectfully: Xander Fletcher, the Communication Director and the Temporary Supreme Second-delegate of the Left for Progress. |
Date | 11:06:10, March 24, 2020 CET | From | White Rose | To | Debating the Trade Unions Act 4730 |
Message | Mr Speaker, Check the history books, this has always been our stance and we believe this is the best and most open policy for Trade Unions. |
Date | 19:20:06, March 24, 2020 CET | From | Luthorian Conservative Party 🔵 | To | Debating the Trade Unions Act 4730 |
Message | Mr. Speaker, We still support our government; however article 2 is a bridge to far the Government has no right to decide who gets fired or not. |
Date | 23:28:51, March 24, 2020 CET | From | Socialist Party | To | Debating the Trade Unions Act 4730 |
Message | Mr. Speaker, What a shame to see the "Liberals" cooperate with the far-right to sack the workers who wish to defend their rights! |
Date | 23:47:07, March 24, 2020 CET | From | Left for Progress | To | Debating the Trade Unions Act 4730 |
Message | Mr. Speaker, The Left for Progress have a strong political alliance with the liberals so we have to defend our comrades. With the logic of the CPL, the conservatives is also traitors because its vote with us under this proposal. The LB is not a traitor of the democratic centre-left and left-wing, they just vote for their believes. Unnecessary this accusations on the Left-Wing. The essence of this bill is that we defeated the exploiter White Rose and only that matter. Respectfully: Xander Fletcher, the Communication Director and the Temporary Supreme Second-delegate of the Left for Progress. |
Date | 23:47:59, March 24, 2020 CET | From | Left for Progress | To | Debating the Trade Unions Act 4730 |
Message | will defeated* |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 66 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 84 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Zardugal is a nation based on the old Byzantine Empire, with a modern twist and the Esperanto language. Zardugal is located on the continent of Majatra. |
Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights |