We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Marriage Act 4732
Details
Submitted by[?]: White Rose
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 4732
Description[?]:
| An Act to ensure the sanctity of marriage |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy toward marriage.
Old value:: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Current: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Proposed: The government only recognises civil marriages between a man and a woman.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:02:21, March 27, 2020 CET | From | Left for Progress | To | Debating the Marriage Act 4732 |
| Message | An another bill from the White Rose and against the sexual freedom. Nonsense. In the temples of course, marriages just may between a man and a woman. But civil marriages just between a man and a woman?! We say that we against all kind of marriage. But If the marriage still exist, then the marriage exist for the LGBTQ-community not just for the heterosexual community. So our vote is "no". Respectfully: Xander Fletcher, the Communication Director and the Temporary Supreme Second-delegate of the Left for Progress Party. |
| Date | 23:44:37, March 27, 2020 CET | From | White Rose | To | Debating the Marriage Act 4732 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, Adam and Eve. |
| Date | 00:48:35, March 28, 2020 CET | From | Left for Progress | To | Debating the Marriage Act 4732 |
| Message | But now there is not two man in this world, Mr. Speaker. Just in Luthori the human race have a hundred million people. From this millions there is thousands of homosexuals and lesbians. Please, think about them when you propose a bill such this. |
| Date | 01:25:35, March 28, 2020 CET | From | White Rose | To | Debating the Marriage Act 4732 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, Their relationships remain valid, they should simply not marry. Whether civil or religious, marriage should be 1 man and 1 woman by definition. |
| Date | 11:05:13, March 28, 2020 CET | From | Socialist Party | To | Debating the Marriage Act 4732 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, You are homophobic, that's all. You can't remove a right that had previously been granted. Homosexual relations are the same as heterosexual relations and therefore, they should be able to marry the same way. |
| Date | 11:31:33, March 28, 2020 CET | From | White Rose | To | Debating the Marriage Act 4732 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, We can remove any right we want to if the majority agree. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 78 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 36 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "Democrats couldn't care less if people in Indiana hate them. But if Europeans curl their lips, liberals can't look at themselves in the mirror." - Ann Coulter |