We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Administritive Realigning Stratagem
Details
Submitted by[?]: Most Noble Order of Stag
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 4740
Description[?]:
Mr Speaker. After looking at our current situation whilst our ReGlorification Act has clearly not been agreed to, we do have some proposals. these are: - Public Financing of Campaigns ~ it is our parties opinion that all parties should be funded however they should also be able to receive donations. - Government-Issued ID Cards ~ in my parties opinion it is frankly draconian to expect members of our great Commonwealth to carry id cards around all of the time. this should be revoked and reworked as per our suggestions - Raising the Professional Retirement Age ~ in a recent study conducted by the Rutanian National Institute it shows that with our average life expectancy increasing we should also be increasing our working-age as people are living longer and working more. if any parties have any suggestions of additions or changes, please contact our parties Director of Communications (Colonel Philip Elwell PC KGRC MPa CInstPM) Kind Regards The Right Honourable Sir George McCormack MF PC KGRC LL.M BLe. The Lord High Commissioner Secretary of State for the Home Department Chief Commissioner of the Rutanian Emergency Services Deputy Leader of the Constitutional Solidarity Party Councillor to the Privy Council Knight Guardian of the Rutania Cross Baronet of Dartworth |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The professional retirement age.
Old value:: 60
Current: 64
Proposed: 65
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government-issued identity card policy.
Old value:: All citizens are issued with identity cards and are required to carry them at all times.
Current: All citizens are issued with identity cards but are not required to carry them.
Proposed: All citizens are issued with identity cards but are not required to carry them.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Public financing of political campaigns
Old value:: Campaigns are never publicly financed.
Current: Candidates that accept public funds cannot accept donations.
Proposed: All candidates receive public funds, and can still accept donations.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 03:54:10, April 09, 2020 CET | From | Social Egalitarian Party | To | Debating the Administritive Realigning Stratagem |
Message | The SEP is in full support of Articles 2 & 3. While we are okay with Article 1, we would prefer if candidates did receive public funds, but not donations. This would allow for a fair and even playing field for all candidates. Tessa Ely, SEP Rep. Internal Affairs. Emma Dickson, SEP Party Leader. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 500 | |||
no | Total Seats: 0 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
Random quote: Time and again, the police prove themselves to be the Class Enemy, an armed mob used to oppress the masses and maintain the wealthy in their privileges. ~Friedrich Pfeiffer, General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party |