We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Defense Bill II
Details
Submitted by[?]: Rightist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2219
Description[?]:
TBA |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change National service.
Old value:: All adults upon completion of schooling must serve either a term in the military or a lesser paid term of civilian national service, at their option.
Current: All adults upon completion of schooling must serve either a term in the military or a lesser paid term of civilian national service, at their option.
Proposed: All adults upon completion of schooling can be required in times of war to serve a term in the military.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 08:20:32, April 15, 2006 CET | From | Social-Conservative party | To | Debating the Defense Bill II |
Message | We oppose,t he current policy is fine |
Date | 17:46:32, April 15, 2006 CET | From | Atlas | To | Debating the Defense Bill II |
Message | Article 1 : what next ?? remove the homosexuals from parliament ? or from school ?? We oppose most strongly ! Article 2 : we would like to see no mandatory service whatever. |
Date | 08:21:55, April 16, 2006 CET | From | Social-Conservative party | To | Debating the Defense Bill II |
Message | Article 1. Why not ??? asks the fundamentalists (over 30%) of the population. But we live in a modern society so we will not do that, but they have no place in the army, |
Date | 12:53:33, April 16, 2006 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Defense Bill II |
Message | We oppose both. |
Date | 18:00:39, April 16, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Defense Bill II |
Message | People, Article 2 is just stating that if there is a war, heaven forbid, that all adults upon completion CAN BE REQUIRED. In other words, it is not mandatory. Why is everyone opposing article 2? |
Date | 23:18:56, April 16, 2006 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Defense Bill II |
Message | Why can't we have gay people in our army? Personally, I think you're just afraid of a thousand guys with M-16s going, 'Who're you calling a faggot?' OOC: not mine, it's one of those random quotes, and I thought it'ld fit in here.. :D |
Date | 22:07:23, April 17, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Defense Bill II |
Message | support 2 not 1 |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 283 | |||
no | Total Seats: 216 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "If God made man they say Sam Colt made them equal." - Unknown |