We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Have countrywide Energy regulation
Details
Submitted by[?]: Likatonia First
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 4755
Description[?]:
Energy laws should be decided by national government and not up to states. This would help companies by laws on this sector being the same countrywide. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Energy regulation.
Old value:: Energy provision is left to local governments.
Current: Energy is provided by private companies but the prices they can charge are regulated.
Proposed: Energy is provided by private, unregulated companies but subsidies are given to those on a low income.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 12:34:40, May 10, 2020 CET | From | Likatonia First | To | Debating the Have countrywide Energy regulation |
Message | What do the other parties in the senate think of this bill |
Date | 17:01:22, May 10, 2020 CET | From | Liberal Democrats | To | Debating the Have countrywide Energy regulation |
Message | LD opposes price controls. We'll probably oppose this. |
Date | 18:08:10, May 10, 2020 CET | From | Likatonia First | To | Debating the Have countrywide Energy regulation |
Message | Who would vote in favour if we just made sure energy was regulated by the national govaernment |
Date | 01:05:09, May 11, 2020 CET | From | Institutional Revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Have countrywide Energy regulation |
Message | We will oppose this bill. We support a government-run energy sector |
Date | 01:11:24, May 11, 2020 CET | From | Likatonia First | To | Debating the Have countrywide Energy regulation |
Message | We are trying to compromise and this means no one will vote for this bill |
Date | 02:40:24, May 11, 2020 CET | From | Conservative Republican Party | To | Debating the Have countrywide Energy regulation |
Message | Yes, LD and CRP want less regulation and therefore prefer the current, IRP wants more, but to an extent to were not many will vote for, however we will compromise at energy will be provided by private companies, prices charged are unregulated or regulations is up to local governments, but the gov. subsidizes low income. |
Date | 16:07:02, May 11, 2020 CET | From | Likatonia First | To | Debating the Have countrywide Energy regulation |
Message | Depending on a discussion with the SD we will either change the law so that energy is run by a nationalised company or that it is run by private companies with unregulated prices but subsidies for people on low income |
Date | 23:08:29, May 11, 2020 CET | From | Democratic Party of Likatonia | To | Debating the Have countrywide Energy regulation |
Message | SD is against this proposal. We preffer current situation of energy regulation |
Date | 00:43:53, May 12, 2020 CET | From | Likatonia First | To | Debating the Have countrywide Energy regulation |
Message | The law has now been changed to what LD and CRP want |
Date | 01:07:34, May 12, 2020 CET | From | Conservative Republican Party | To | Debating the Have countrywide Energy regulation |
Message | Okay we will support |
Date | 03:11:27, May 12, 2020 CET | From | Liberal Democrats | To | Debating the Have countrywide Energy regulation |
Message | We'll support this. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 63 | ||||||
no | Total Seats: 10 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 27 |
Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life fictional references (eg. Gandalf, Harry Potter, Luke Skywalker). |
Random quote: "John Burroughs has stated that experimental study of animals in captivity is absolutely useless. Their character, their habits, their appetites undergo a complete transformation when torn from their soil in field and forest. With human nature caged in a narrow space, whipped daily into submission, how can we speak of its potentialities?" - Emma Goldman |