Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5472
Next month in: 00:12:04
Server time: 19:47:55, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): ameerali | burgerboys | HawkDun | Vilnius | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Have countrywide Energy regulation

Details

Submitted by[?]: Likatonia First

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 4755

Description[?]:

Energy laws should be decided by national government and not up to states. This would help companies by laws on this sector being the same countrywide.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:34:40, May 10, 2020 CET
FromLikatonia First
ToDebating the Have countrywide Energy regulation
MessageWhat do the other parties in the senate think of this bill

Date17:01:22, May 10, 2020 CET
FromLiberal Democrats
ToDebating the Have countrywide Energy regulation
MessageLD opposes price controls. We'll probably oppose this.

Date18:08:10, May 10, 2020 CET
FromLikatonia First
ToDebating the Have countrywide Energy regulation
MessageWho would vote in favour if we just made sure energy was regulated by the national govaernment

Date01:05:09, May 11, 2020 CET
FromInstitutional Revolutionary Party
ToDebating the Have countrywide Energy regulation
MessageWe will oppose this bill. We support a government-run energy sector

Date01:11:24, May 11, 2020 CET
FromLikatonia First
ToDebating the Have countrywide Energy regulation
MessageWe are trying to compromise and this means no one will vote for this bill

Date02:40:24, May 11, 2020 CET
FromConservative Republican Party
ToDebating the Have countrywide Energy regulation
MessageYes, LD and CRP want less regulation and therefore prefer the current, IRP wants more, but to an extent to were not many will vote for, however we will compromise at energy will be provided by private companies, prices charged are unregulated or regulations is up to local governments, but the gov. subsidizes low income.

Date16:07:02, May 11, 2020 CET
FromLikatonia First
ToDebating the Have countrywide Energy regulation
MessageDepending on a discussion with the SD we will either change the law so that energy is run by a nationalised company or that it is run by private companies with unregulated prices but subsidies for people on low income

Date23:08:29, May 11, 2020 CET
FromDemocratic Party of Likatonia
ToDebating the Have countrywide Energy regulation
MessageSD is against this proposal. We preffer current situation of energy regulation

Date00:43:53, May 12, 2020 CET
FromLikatonia First
ToDebating the Have countrywide Energy regulation
MessageThe law has now been changed to what LD and CRP want

Date01:07:34, May 12, 2020 CET
FromConservative Republican Party
ToDebating the Have countrywide Energy regulation
MessageOkay we will support

Date03:11:27, May 12, 2020 CET
FromLiberal Democrats
ToDebating the Have countrywide Energy regulation
MessageWe'll support this.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 63

no
 

Total Seats: 10

abstain
 

Total Seats: 27


Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life fictional references (eg. Gandalf, Harry Potter, Luke Skywalker).

Random quote: "John Burroughs has stated that experimental study of animals in captivity is absolutely useless. Their character, their habits, their appetites undergo a complete transformation when torn from their soil in field and forest. With human nature caged in a narrow space, whipped daily into submission, how can we speak of its potentialities?" - Emma Goldman

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 72