We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Protection for Polygamous Marriages Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Libertarian Nationalist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 4771
Description[?]:
We propose we give the same rights to people in polygamous marriages, as people in normal ones. This is to ensure equal treatment to people who practice religions that believe in polygamous marriages. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to polygamy.
Old value:: There is no explicit government policy on polygamy.
Current: There is no explicit government policy on polygamy.
Proposed: Polygamous marriages are accorded equal recognition to monogamous marriages.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:51:26, June 15, 2020 CET | From | Libertarian Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Protection for Polygamous Marriages Act |
Message | Thoughts? |
Date | 22:27:22, June 15, 2020 CET | From | The Moderates | To | Debating the Protection for Polygamous Marriages Act |
Message | We would probably support. |
Date | 00:42:15, June 16, 2020 CET | From | Likatonia First | To | Debating the Protection for Polygamous Marriages Act |
Message | We would support |
Date | 00:59:00, June 16, 2020 CET | From | Conservative Monarchist Alliance | To | Debating the Protection for Polygamous Marriages Act |
Message | My party strongly opposes this. Marriage is between a man and a woman, not between multiple persons. Furthermore, polygamous marriages have a long history of being conflict-ridden and bringing great inequality to women. Alfred Cecil Leader of the Conservative Monarchist Alliance |
Date | 01:21:37, June 16, 2020 CET | From | Institutional Revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Protection for Polygamous Marriages Act |
Message | Will support |
Date | 03:00:40, June 16, 2020 CET | From | Socialists People’s Party | To | Debating the Protection for Polygamous Marriages Act |
Message | We are unsure about this issue and as a result we will abstain. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 69 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 22 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 9 |
Random fact: "Nation raiding" or a malevolent coordinated effort by a single user or group of users to interrupt the gameplay, significantly alter the culture or direction of a nation is strictly prohibited. Players interacting in nation raiding will be sanctioned. |
Random quote: "A claim for equality of material position can be met only by a government with totalitarian powers." - Friedrich Hayek |