We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Great Act 2
Details
Submitted by[?]: Union of Real Politics (URP)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2217
Description[?]:
| ,,, |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change
The government's policy regarding foreign embassies.
Old value:: Foreign countries may establish an embassy after obtaining approval from the Foreign Office.
Current: Foreign countries may establish an embassy after obtaining approval from the Foreign Office.
Proposed: Any other country may establish an embassy on national soil.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:22:35, April 20, 2006 CET | From | AMDRepublicanKadima | To | Debating the Great Act 2 |
| Message | I agree, it is vital for our relations with other countries to allow embassies from all. I missed this when i was going over our laws. Thank you for bringing it up URP |
| Date | 04:05:43, April 20, 2006 CET | From | Socialibertarian Party | To | Debating the Great Act 2 |
| Message | I have to give it to you, using three commas rather than three periods was certainly original. |
| Date | 04:35:04, April 20, 2006 CET | From | AMDRepublicanKadima | To | Debating the Great Act 2 |
| Message | I have thought this over a little more and i now relize that i find myself wondering: there is no reason why a nation would not get approval from the foreign office unless they where a slave state, or we or one of our allies was at war with them. with this in mind, i have decided to vote against this bill. URP, it was a good idea but i cannot agree with it. to all other parties: your voting on this bill will NOT have an effect on relations with the AMDRepublicanKadima Party. |
| Date | 07:43:35, April 20, 2006 CET | From | Union of Real Politics (URP) | To | Debating the Great Act 2 |
| Message | AMD RK funny party: yes, no, yes, no etc. Probably, you do not know you want that!!!!!!! |
| Date | 03:35:23, April 21, 2006 CET | From | AMDRepublicanKadima | To | Debating the Great Act 2 |
| Message | amd = south africa liberation party republicans = republicans kadima = israeli party (kadima means "foward" in hebrew) i would rather vote no with the group, and leave things how they are, then vote yes and allow for chance when i am unsure if it is for the better. the other parties and i are in close contact almost every day or so, maybe you should start talking to me in private to gain my support, and not just propose bills of which a majority or against everyone elses beliefs, and the rest are so contriversal (like this one) that you did not debate the subject at all. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 31 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 66 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 3 |
| Random fact: Culturally Open nations can adopt advisory/non-enforceable Nation Descriptions. See http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6242 |
| Random quote: "More Medicament Manufacture take the profits, workers take the factory" - Boros Norbert, former Endralonian businessman |