We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Abortion
Details
Submitted by[?]: Marxist-Atheist Alliance
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2069
Description[?]:
| Womens Rights |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the legality of abortions
Old value:: Abortions are only allowed in medical emergencies.
Current: Abortion is allowed during the first trimester.
Proposed: Abortion is allowed during the first and second trimesters.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:03:47, June 15, 2005 CET | From | Worker's Alliance | To | Debating the Abortion |
| Message | While I would vote with this on principal, you have to compromise |
| Date | 22:55:38, June 15, 2005 CET | From | Christian Fundamentalist Party | To | Debating the Abortion |
| Message | My RL friends CG and BRP have some SIp problems so they won't likely be able to vote,so it will probably pass. |
| Date | 22:56:03, June 15, 2005 CET | From | Christian Fundamentalist Party | To | Debating the Abortion |
| Message | Not Sip i mean ISP |
| Date | 00:02:36, June 18, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian Socialist Party (RDL) | To | Debating the Abortion |
| Message | This does not go far enough. Free abortion on demand is my parties policy |
| Date | 01:56:30, June 18, 2005 CET | From | Christian Fundamentalist Party | To | Debating the Abortion |
| Message | You mean murdering of babies is your policy? |
| Date | 23:46:14, June 19, 2005 CET | From | Sociofeudalist Party | To | Debating the Abortion |
| Message | I think this law should remain as it is, if the mother's life is not endangered there is no need for abortion, the child can be given for adoption or to a religious order for rising. It is a nonsenso to practice abortion when so many people are desperate to adopt a child. |
| Date | 00:08:11, June 20, 2005 CET | From | Christian Fundamentalist Party | To | Debating the Abortion |
| Message | Welcome Sociofeudalist Party good to have you here. |
| Date | 12:30:46, June 20, 2005 CET | From | Marxist-Atheist Alliance | To | Debating the Abortion |
| Message | But it is not the 'adopter' who is carrying the child. You cant force people to have a child, especially when you wont supply contraception either |
| Date | 12:36:26, June 20, 2005 CET | From | Christian Fundamentalist Party | To | Debating the Abortion |
| Message | "you wont supply contraception either" Please ... they can buy whatever they want from anywhere thay want. |
| Date | 14:56:45, June 20, 2005 CET | From | Sociofeudalist Party | To | Debating the Abortion |
| Message | I can force people to have childs, as long as not having them means murdering them. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 29 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 39 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 7 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "When was the last time you talked about race with someone of a different race? If the answer is never, you're part of the problem." - Bill Bradley |