We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Military Reform Law
Details
Submitted by[?]: Jakania Republican Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2218
Description[?]:
This is a basic reform law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change National service.
Old value:: There shall be no mandatory military or civilian national service.
Current: All adults upon completion of schooling must serve a term in the military.
Proposed: All adults upon completion of schooling can be required in times of war to serve a term in the military.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the export of weapons to other nations.
Old value:: The government must approve all arms sales on a case by case basis.
Current: The government allows conventional arms to be exported freely.
Proposed: The government allows conventional arms to be exported freely.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 10:19:39, April 23, 2006 CET | From | Libertarian-Socialist Coalition | To | Debating the Military Reform Law |
Message | Article 1 is something this aprty has fought against in the past. We are a government for the people and by the people. If an offensive war erupts and the public does not agree with the war, then we have no right to coerce our citizens into risking their lives. Conversely, say we are attacked by another power. If nobody signs up to defend their homeland or is willing to fight for their way of life, then our government really has no legitimacy and deserves to fall. |
Date | 10:19:59, April 23, 2006 CET | From | Libertarian-Socialist Coalition | To | Debating the Military Reform Law |
Message | Article 1 is something this party has fought against in the past. We are a government for the people and by the people. If an offensive war erupts and the public does not agree with the war, then we have no right to coerce our citizens into risking their lives. Conversely, say we are attacked by another power. If nobody signs up to defend their homeland or is willing to fight for their way of life, then our government really has no legitimacy and deserves to fall. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 22 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 140 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 88 |
Random fact: Moderation will not accept Cultural Protocol updates which introduce, on a significant scale, cultures which are likely to be insufficiently accessible to players. In particular, for all significant cultures in Particracy, it should be easy for players to access and use online resources to assist with language translation and the generation of character names. Moderation reserves the right to amend Cultural Protocols which are deemed to have introduced significant cultures that are not sufficiently accessible and which are not being actively role-played with. |
Random quote: "You cannot open a book without learning something." - Confucius |