Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5472
Next month in: 03:51:05
Server time: 16:08:54, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Lab47AU | starfruit | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: RP: Demonstrations against the Manstad II Cabinet

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Movement

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 4822

Description[?]:

This event will happen since it does not significantly impact the game, according to the RP agreement of 4636 (http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=608812)

---------------
Event: Today, 200 000 people protested in Fort William against the Unity government. Those protests were launched by the National Movement and the LCP. The protesters denounce an anti-democratic government working against the will of Imperator Carter. These are the largest protests Luthori has seen since 10 years. Count William of Hurrington made a speech during the demonstrations, here is a part of it:
"Why is is that the particracy always allies against us? Why is it that they grab power like power-hungry beasts? Why are we always left on the sidelines? Why are they destroying our democracy? We need to rise up, we need to kick the political elites out of power because their place is in jail. They betrayed our nation, they betrayed you for too long. Mass unemployment, mass immigration, racemixing, corruption,... What are we waiting for to boot them out of power? "

Before the protets, the police frisked everyone and kept 200 people in custody for possession of weapons during a demonstration. A few incidents were also reported: 3 cars and 10 trashcans were burned by angry protesters.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:53:03, September 26, 2020 CET
FromConservative Liberal Party
ToDebating the RP: Demonstrations against the Manstad II Cabinet
MessageLCP question to the White Rose:

What conditions would you require to join a coalition with us and the NM?

Date14:52:24, September 26, 2020 CET
FromULF-Social-Revolutionaries
ToDebating the RP: Demonstrations against the Manstad II Cabinet
MessageThe Imperial Seal Bearer James Manstad does want to remind the protestors that they want to have democracy, and they have democracy since they are allowed to demonstrate and give their opinion.
But he doesn't think they are able to do that if the undemocratic NM gets elected because they want to expand the power of the position of Imperator and make Count William of Hurrington Imperator for life, if that isn't undemocratic then the USRM doesn't know what is.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
        

Total Seats: 150

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain

      Total Seats: 0


      Random fact: Players who deliberately attempt to present a misleading picture of the nation's current RP laws will be subject to sanction.

      Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia)

      This page was generated with PHP
      Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
      Queries performed: 43