We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Strong Military Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Constitutional Republican Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 4825
Description[?]:
. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards the use of land mines by the army.
Old value:: The use of land mines is allowed but restricted.
Current: The use of land mines is allowed but restricted.
Proposed: The use of land mines is allowed.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Military stance on homosexuality.
Old value:: Homosexuality is allowed in the military.
Current: Homosexuality is allowed in the military.
Proposed: Homosexuality is not tolerated in the military. The military actively seeks to remove homosexuals from it.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards civilians who conscientiously object to being required to perform military service (if applicable).
Old value:: Conscientious objectors can be exempted from combatant roles, but not from non-combatant roles.
Current: Conscientious objectors are exempted.
Proposed: It is a criminal offence to refuse to perform military service.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 18:26:53, October 02, 2020 CET | From | National Federal Democratic Union Party | To | Debating the Strong Military Bill |
Message | Mr. Speaker, Though Article 1 of this bill is fine, the discrimination towards Homosexuals and Conscientious objectors is intolerable, immoral, and down right authoritarian. We are not at war, the nation is stable, our borders are safe. Why do we need a stronger millitary? Lyra Baker NFDUP-(S) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 125 | ||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
Random quote: "He who is unable to live in society, or who has no need because he is sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god." - Aristotle |