Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5460
Next month in: 00:32:30
Server time: 15:27:29, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): ADM Drax | Brazil25 | R Drax | Triguns7491 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Strong Military Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Constitutional Republican Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 4825

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:26:53, October 02, 2020 CET
FromNational Federal Democratic Union Party
ToDebating the Strong Military Bill
MessageMr. Speaker,

Though Article 1 of this bill is fine, the discrimination towards Homosexuals and Conscientious objectors is intolerable, immoral, and down right authoritarian. We are not at war, the nation is stable, our borders are safe. Why do we need a stronger millitary?

Lyra Baker
NFDUP-(S)

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 125

no
 

Total Seats: 0

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar).

Random quote: "He who is unable to live in society, or who has no need because he is sufficient for himself, must be either a beast or a god." - Aristotle

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 52