We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Revised Cabinet Proposal, Jan 2067
Details
Submitted by[?]: Lodamun Centre-Left Coalition
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2067
Description[?]:
| This is the revised Cabinet proposal, with regards to the Consensus Act. Per the Consensus Act, which has not passed, the Cabinet positions are to be distributed proportionately. The seven parties with the most seats (PACF, CCF-Greens, SAP, Amystian Council and the MLP) have been offered Cabinet positions. |
Proposals
Article 1
As per the Constitution, the President of the Commonwealth chairs the cabinet.
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Cooperative Commonwealth Federation
Article 3
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Lodamun Centre-Left Coalition
Article 4
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Chorus of Amyst
Article 5
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Chorus of Amyst
Article 6
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Lodamun Centre-Left Coalition
Article 7
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Sensible Activists Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the CNT/AFL
Article 9
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the 
National People's Gang
Article 10
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the MLTP (The Resistance)
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:14:03, June 16, 2005 CET | From | Cooperative Commonwealth Federation | To | Debating the Revised Cabinet Proposal, Jan 2067 |
| Message | ((I'd be requesting the environment ministry if there was one. Anyone mind if we consider science, tech & ag to include the environment?)) |
| Date | 13:52:16, June 16, 2005 CET | From | National People's Gang | To | Debating the Revised Cabinet Proposal, Jan 2067 |
| Message | Our current vote in favour may be subject to change. |
| Date | 13:56:50, June 16, 2005 CET | From | National People's Gang | To | Debating the Revised Cabinet Proposal, Jan 2067 |
| Message | We'd also like to point out to the Adam Smith Party that, in line with the spirit of the Consensus Act, of 450 total seats in parliament and 10 seats in cabinet, they are presumably not included in this proposal because their representation is currently too small. When any party achieves close to 45 seats, we would expect them to be included, as long as they fulfill the other requirements. |
| Date | 15:54:12, June 16, 2005 CET | From | Adam Smith Party | To | Debating the Revised Cabinet Proposal, Jan 2067 |
| Message | I am not expecting any seats in the cabinet just yet thank you. Whaer did you get the idea that I was from? |
| Date | 17:27:07, June 16, 2005 CET | From | Adam Smith Party | To | Debating the Revised Cabinet Proposal, Jan 2067 |
| Message | As this proposal fits the proportional requirements and we have no objections to the allocations we will support this proposal For information only we have calculated the proportional representation to imply the following distribution of seats in the cabinet MLP - 3 AC - 2 CNT - 1 SAP - 1 CFC - 1 MLT -1 2nd -1 Cryhavoc and Adam Smith (ourselves) - 0 |
| Date | 19:04:28, June 16, 2005 CET | From | National People's Gang | To | Debating the Revised Cabinet Proposal, Jan 2067 |
| Message | We just wanted to make sure the ASPs didn't feel excluded and understood the reasoning behind the proposed cabinet. |
| Date | 19:49:57, June 16, 2005 CET | From | Adam Smith Party | To | Debating the Revised Cabinet Proposal, Jan 2067 |
| Message | We do not suffer from that imagined ailment that the left call alienation. We are mature enough to accept the decisions of our people. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 390 | |||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 56 |
| Random fact: Particracy has 464 player slots. |
| Random quote: "It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." - Thomas Jefferson |