We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Minimum Sentences Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Rassemblement Républicain de Rildanor
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 4854
Description[?]:
| In order to give judges a clear framework and so that everyone knows what they incur if they are the perpetrator of a crime, we are proposing to set mandatory minimum sentences for all crimes. The stake is the safety of the Rildanorians, but also to harmonize the sentences according to the crimes in order to obtain more equity. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on mandatory minimums
Old value:: There are mandatory minimums on violent/serious crimes
Current: There are no mandatory minimums
Proposed: There are mandatory minimums on all crimes
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:17:34, November 28, 2020 CET | From | Nouveau Parti Populaire | To | Debating the Minimum Sentences Act |
| Message | We believe that it is not necessary for us to reform this. We believe that violent/serious crimes are the ones that do need a mandatory minimum. Misdemeanors would not need to have these minimums. If this were to be approved, Rildanor would be one of the few countries that would make misdemeanors mandatory. Of course, we will not be those countries that do not have mandatory minimums. Alexis Chauveau, NPP National Convention Whip |
| Date | 12:56:25, November 29, 2020 CET | From | Rassemblement Républicain de Rildanor | To | Debating the Minimum Sentences Act |
| Message | We believe that fairness must be guaranteed for all crimes and this fairness requires harmonization. The establishment of minimum sentences facilitates this harmonization, as is done in Kanjor. This subject separates us. Anouk Valette Representative of RRR conventionists |
| Date | 15:04:56, November 29, 2020 CET | From | Nouveau Parti Populaire | To | Debating the Minimum Sentences Act |
| Message | You know that Mr. Valette, you are right, the NPP will vote in favor of this reform. Alexis Chauveau, NPP National Convention Whip |
| Date | 21:24:37, November 29, 2020 CET | From | Rassemblement Républicain de Rildanor | To | Debating the Minimum Sentences Act |
| Message | We did not expect this twist. Whatever it is, we respect the choice that will be made by the NPP conventionists. We believe in the freedom to be able to bring an opinion to this assembly and support it. Anouk Valette Representative of RRR conventionists |
| Date | 21:28:50, November 29, 2020 CET | From | Rassemblement Républicain de Rildanor | To | Debating the Minimum Sentences Act |
| Message | To be clearer: NPP conventionists are free to disagree and have the right to support a different point of view. It would be inappropriate of us not to admit it. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 455 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Real-life quotations may be used in Particracy, but the real-life speaker or author should always be referenced in an OOC (out-of-character) note alongside the quotation. |
| Random quote: "I think it's about time we voted for senators with breasts. After all, we've been voting for boobs long enough." - Clarie Sargent |