We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Anti-Surrealism Act of 2220
Details
Submitted by[?]: Mouvement des Conservateurs
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2222
Description[?]:
| Surrealism isn't only a artistic trend anymore but it seems to have become way of living. In our country citizens are allowed to wear guns and firearms but authorities .... aren't. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The weapons used by police forces.
Old value:: Police officers may only carry non-lethal weapons apart from specially trained firearms units.
Current: Police officers may only carry non-lethal weapons apart from specially trained firearms units.
Proposed: Police officers carry standard firearms.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Weapons allowed to private citizens.
Old value:: Citizens may own any type of weapon. They may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Current: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Proposed: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:10:00, May 01, 2006 CET | From | Classical Liberal Party | To | Debating the Anti-Surrealism Act of 2220 |
| Message | We like the first proposal but we are skeptical of the second proposal. We will wait to see the other parties positions on this bill before we decide which way to vote. |
| Date | 06:57:41, May 01, 2006 CET | From |  Front Canrillaise | To | Debating the Anti-Surrealism Act of 2220 |
| Message | We also like the first and do not like the second. |
| Date | 15:32:12, May 02, 2006 CET | From | Mouvement des Conservateurs | To | Debating the Anti-Surrealism Act of 2220 |
| Message | We are not going to change anything about this bill. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 132 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 266 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 352 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "I swear to the Lord I still can't see Why Democracy means Everybody but me." - Langston Hughes, The Black Man Speaks |