We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: RP: Introduction of Parliamentary Rules
Details
Submitted by[?]: Nationell Samling
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 5149
Description[?]:
| This bill is modeled after the Istalian parliamentary rules: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=508230 RP Parliamentary rules' articles (OOC: the mods confirmed me that they are binding for the players): 1) It's compulsory for the members of the legislature(s) (players) to enter in the title of each bill that are going to propose to the legislature(s) the following specifications: 1.a) "R.f.s." (Regeringsförslag): if it is a government's initiative bill, and therefore proposed by the government (through the parties that support him/her in parliament) after approval by the Council of Ministers; 1.b) "L.f.s." (Lagförslag): in case the bill is proposed by a member of parliament individually or from his/her political group (in the opposition or into the government's majority). 1.c) If a R.f.s. bill don't have none of two entries listed under the paragraph 2.a) and 2.b), this is considered as if it were a L.f.s. (non-governmental bill). 1.d) Only exceptions are proposal to review, approval or annulment of a treaty drawn up or presented by the Minister of Foreign Affairs, a proposal for a review and/or approval of the budget drawn up by the Ministry of Finance, a bill to call early election. (the players are not obliged to specify "L.f.s. or R.f.s." if a players creates a bill to ask or propose events for the developing of Role Play History or if it's a question or other arguments related with the game) 1.e) After the enter "L.f.s." or "R.f.s." the parties have to specify the progressive number(pn) of the bill for each years(yy) of the legislature in this form: pn/yy. L.f.s. and R.f.s. follow separate progression. The year(s) should follow the Revolutionary calendar: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=639098 1.f) Examples: "L.f.s. 02/70 - Economic proposal", "R.f.s. 02/70 - State Intervention", "L.f.s. 03/70 - Marriage Act", "L.f.s. 05/71 - Media reforms Act", "R.f.s. 01/71 - Work Protection", etc.... * * * * * * * * * 2) The players, in the description of a bill that are about to propose or when they write a message under a bill, must use the form rules delineate in the paragraphs below : 2.a) an incipit where indicate who presents the bill or express a message (example: "the Minister of Foreign Affairs Stefan Larsson", "the X Party's member Stefan Larsson", "the X Party's whip (chief of the party in parliament) of the National Convention Stefan Larsson", "the Government....", ecc...). 2.b) than the text of the proposal, or the message under the bill (where the players can play a member of parliament). 2.c) the (players) members of the parliament have to use a language suitables for the legislative body (example: "honorables members of parliament", "we thanks the minister/party/member of parliament X for his intervention", "my party want present this bill because", "we, the X Party, conscious of..., we'll vote against...., we accept this proposal..., I do not endorse this bill... (if talks a single member individually it's possible use the first person), etc...). |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:33:52, July 11, 2022 CET | From |  Moderation | To | Debating the RP: Introduction of Parliamentary Rules |
| Message | OOC: Archiving. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 295 |
| Random fact: Characters are considered to be "owned" by the player who first mentioned or created them. In practice, players may share responsibility for role-playing a character, but ultimate authority rests with the owner. |
| Random quote: "To refuse political equality is to rob the ostracized of all self-respect." - Elizabeth Cady Stanton |