We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Defense of Freedoms
Details
Submitted by[?]: Protectorate Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2222
Description[?]:
Our laws, indeed our nation is decending into tyranny. We must fight back and restore our freedoms. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The citizens' right to assemble in public.
Old value:: The police may disperse a group if they believe it poses a potential risk to public safety.
Current: The police may disperse a group if they believe it poses a potential risk to public safety.
Proposed: There are no restrictions on the right of citizens to assemble in groups.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military is not allowed to play any part in it.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place and the military is not allowed to play any part in it.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change National service.
Old value:: All adults upon completion of schooling can be required in times of war to serve a term in the military.
Current: All adults upon completion of schooling can be required in times of war to serve a term in the military.
Proposed: There shall be no mandatory military or civilian national service.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Right to privacy.
Old value:: Individuals have a right to privacy, but the courts can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data).
Current: Individuals have a right to privacy, to keep records and information for themselves.
Proposed: Individuals have a right to privacy, to keep records and information for themselves.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 03:05:43, May 02, 2006 CET | From | Malivianese Militarist Party | To | Debating the Defense of Freedoms |
Message | We disagree completely. The Protectorate Party has sat on the sidelines time and time again when our nation face 400+ deaths due to religious violence and 11 of our own party members were slain in a terrorist attack. Who knows how many more would die if these safeguards are not in place? 1) If a group is a risk to safety, it needs to be dispersed or we risk innocent lives. 2) Currently our police force is ill equipped. It is clear the military is spearheading the safety of the Federation. 3) At the very least, we must keep all options, including a call to service, if it is deemed necessary. 4) The Justice Department should have the power to do such. Essentially it is a search warrant for data. |
Date | 01:48:05, May 04, 2006 CET | From | Black Shadow | To | Debating the Defense of Freedoms |
Message | No military service? Damn Geraja worshippers. |
Date | 17:50:35, May 04, 2006 CET | From | Ministerial Party | To | Debating the Defense of Freedoms |
Message | Bad Protectorates. BAD. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 47 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 177 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 77 |
Random fact: After 3 days (72 hours) your account will be inactivated by Moderation. If you want to be reactivated you can request reactivation located here: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4360 |
Random quote: "A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks." - Thomas Jefferson |