We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Retirement Act (Renewal)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Tenshi no Kami
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2222
Description[?]:
| ... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The professional retirement age.
Old value:: 70
Current: 60
Proposed: 65
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 09:35:53, May 02, 2006 CET | From |  Bachelor Party | To | Debating the Retirement Act (Renewal) |
| Message | We oppose manditory retirement. Our economic prosperity grants everyone the ability to retire far before they reach 65 anyway, and most do. Those who work beyond 65 are those who do so because they want to. Retirees do not live in comfort off the government, so requiring an earlier mandatory retirement age means taking those few elderly people who have not saved for their own retirement, and kicking them out of their jobs. Please. Have a heart. Let them continue to work and earn a living. - Uripides U. Beium, Bachelor Party Advisor on Trade and Industry |
| Date | 03:54:19, May 03, 2006 CET | From | Party for the Promotion of Pandas | To | Debating the Retirement Act (Renewal) |
| Message | I think this is the first time ive seen an argument sway me. Unless theres some sort of welfare prgram in place it does appear it would be better to gain the maximum they can. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 135 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 198 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Unless otherwise stated, monarchs and their royal houses will be presumed to be owned by the player who introduced the bill appointing them to their position. |
| Random quote: "In politics, madame, you need two things: friends, but above all an enemy." - Brian Mulroney |