Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5461
Next month in: 01:12:25
Server time: 22:47:34, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): ADM Drax | R Drax | reformist2024 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Nuclear Power Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Communist Party of Aldegar

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2223

Description[?]:

No to nuclear power

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:26:45, May 04, 2006 CET
FromCommunist Party of Aldegar
ToDebating the Nuclear Power Act
MessageWe propose that nuclear power plants are banned from our country. They are dangerous and there are much safer ways to generate energy for our citizens.

Date20:57:22, May 04, 2006 CET
FromFenner Brockway Socialist Party
ToDebating the Nuclear Power Act
MessageMost of the time they're very safe, but what is true is that in the unlikely event that an accident does occur or a mistake is made (or in the event of a terrorist attack on the facility), the effect could be catastrophic. Further, there is no satisfactory system of storing nuclear waste over a long period. Disposing of the waste safely can be expensive and it needs to be kept in containment (usually underground) for hundreds of years.

We support this bill.

Date23:19:52, May 04, 2006 CET
FromTee Party
ToDebating the Nuclear Power Act
MessageIf nuclear is unacceptable what is acceptable? Fossil Fuels? A million hampsters in their little wheels? How about all that stored energy in socks that come right out of the dryer???

All energy has a downside--nuclear's downsisde in the course of human history is no worse. To take an effecient, cheap, environmentally friendly energy off the table is just plain short-sighted.

Date23:23:14, May 04, 2006 CET
FromTee Party
ToDebating the Nuclear Power Act
MessageIf nuclear is unacceptable what is acceptable? Fossil Fuels? A million hampsters in their little wheels? How about all that stored energy in socks that come right out of the dryer???

All energy has a downside--nuclear's downsisde in the course of human history is no worse. To take an effecient, cheap, environmentally friendly energy off the table is just plain short-sighted.

Date13:56:48, May 05, 2006 CET
From Ducal Delegation
ToDebating the Nuclear Power Act
MessageHis Grace has concerns about nuclear power, but doesn't think banning it is the right solution.


Percy Waterman
(Personal Secretary to the Grand Duke of Hikirena)

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 169

no
    

Total Seats: 180

abstain
  

Total Seats: 26


Random fact: Jelbic = "Group of cultures with an overall Central Asian/Eurasian steppe theme, using a fictional language developed specifically for Particracy".

Random quote: "We make war that we may live in peace." - Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 61