We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Malpractice Act (amendment)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2242
Description[?]:
Malpractice suits may be brought against doctors. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Malpractice suits.
Old value:: Malpractice suits may be brought against doctors only if death occurs.
Current: Malpractice suits may be brought against doctors.
Proposed: Malpractice suits may be brought against doctors.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:58:36, May 09, 2006 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Malpractice Act (amendment) |
Message | What if you wake up after a routine operation and you notice they've amputated your leg?? |
Date | 15:18:00, May 11, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Malpractice Act (amendment) |
Message | We'll oppose the measure. |
Date | 16:28:44, May 11, 2006 CET | From | Atlas | To | Debating the Malpractice Act (amendment) |
Message | We support. Doctors should take insurance if they think they might amputate the wrong leg once in a while. |
Date | 20:29:45, May 13, 2006 CET | From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the Malpractice Act (amendment) |
Message | umm yea and they'll be put out of business due to said insurance. Opposed. |
Date | 13:22:19, May 29, 2006 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Malpractice Act (amendment) |
Message | They won't be put out of business because of that. Where the hell did you get that? That's bullshit, you just made that up. It works in other countries without any problems, so why shouldn't it work here.. |
Date | 23:58:31, June 02, 2006 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Malpractice Act (amendment) |
Message | What if only a medical regulatory body could prosecute? |
Date | 13:33:13, June 09, 2006 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Malpractice Act (amendment) |
Message | ello? any opinion on my last suggestion?? |
Date | 20:41:27, June 09, 2006 CET | From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the Malpractice Act (amendment) |
Message | Opposed. |
Date | 18:54:58, June 15, 2006 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Malpractice Act (amendment) |
Message | well, never mind then, this has been in debate for long enough, a bit too long for my habit.. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 216 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 283 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: For more information on Particracy's former colonial nations, check out http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6640 |
Random quote: "Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time." - Winston Churchill |