We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ecology bill of 2225
Details
Submitted by[?]: Malivia Liberals
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2226
Description[?]:
To better the enviorment and its related themes. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Waste disposal responsibility.
Old value:: It is the responsibility of local governments to decide on waste disposal regulation.
Current: The government is responsible for waste disposal.
Proposed: Waste disposal is left entirely to the private sector but is regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 03:54:19, May 12, 2006 CET | From | Malivianese Militarist Party | To | Debating the Ecology bill of 2225 |
Message | We disagree. Why should a multi-national company get to manage waste and say landfills will go here and there? The local government knows their needs best and this is an area that is best left to the people since they are paying for it anyways. |
Date | 12:54:28, May 12, 2006 CET | From | Free Progress Alliance | To | Debating the Ecology bill of 2225 |
Message | We concur with the MMP. For once. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 105 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 135 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 61 |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "If God had wanted us to vote, he would have given us candidates." - Jay Leno |